How dare you taunt those presently suffering from the vapors over things we have known for years. Nt (Reply #1)

In the discussion thread: I don't get the Snowden/phone records thing. Yes, been offline. [View all]

Response to uppityperson (Original post)

Sun Jun 23, 2013, 04:04 PM

pkdu (3,977 posts)

1. How dare you taunt those presently suffering from the vapors over things we have known for years. Nt

Ok.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

37 replies	Author	Time	Post
I don't get the Snowden/phone records thing. Yes, been offline. [View all]	uppityperson	Jun 2013	OP
How dare you taunt those presently suffering from the vapors over things we have known for years. Nt	pkdu	Jun 2013	#1
True, we have known for years. But they want to prosecute him, revoked passport, and head of NSA	The Straight Story	Jun 2013	#4
I agree we still classify way too much as "secret"...on the other hand , confirming US and UK were	pkdu	Jun 2013	#6
From what I read, he did break the law. Not judging is the law is good or not, but just that he brok	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#12
Ah, but there is the problem I see	The Straight Story	Jun 2013	#17
"He (Snowden) exposed others breaking laws"	Cali_Democrat	Jun 2013	#20
Well, this would be a place to start:	The Straight Story	Jun 2013	#25
You need to get in touch with the Supreme Court right away	Ms. Toad	Jun 2013	#5
I am seeking info rather than desiring to turn yet another thread into useless snark. Thank you.	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#10
A little too much faux-outrage by Obama-bots for my taste	99th_Monkey	Jun 2013	#2
From what I've read, which isn't a lot, it seems what he revealed was already known, but again I	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#11
I think Snowden revealed the VAST EXTENT of spying on US citizens	99th_Monkey	Jun 2013	#15
Thank you, that makes sense. nt	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#16
It's a lot more than that, uppityperson.	Th1onein	Jun 2013	#3
Breaking News: US spy agencies...spy	NightWatcher	Jun 2013	#8
Right, thanks,	elleng	Jun 2013	#32
Thank you for the information as that part I hadn't heard. I appreciate your answering and	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#9
That's not entirely true.	jazzimov	Jun 2013	#27
Nope nothing new	NightWatcher	Jun 2013	#7
An attempt at a balanced appraisal	Recursion	Jun 2013	#13
Thank you. I appreciate the appraisal and information.	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#14
I would add #4: The FISA court secretly ruled some of what the NSA was doing	HardTimes99	Jun 2013	#18
I don't think that was him	Recursion	Jun 2013	#19
Ah, got you. It has all sort of blended together in my head, I'll readily grant. Also, possible #5	HardTimes99	Jun 2013	#21
Well, adding to the complexity, we don't know what came from BAH	Recursion	Jun 2013	#22
I think 'uppityperson' has his or her reading cut out for	HardTimes99	Jun 2013	#23
I think one thing that was revealed...	TeeYiYi	Jun 2013	#24
No. PRISM's name was revealed previously, and it's not a spy program	Recursion	Jun 2013	#26
Not according to the Boston Globe...	TeeYiYi	Jun 2013	#28
Then the Globe needs a better reporter	Recursion	Jun 2013	#30
Clandestine since 2007...	TeeYiYi	Jun 2013	#34
First, if you haven't already, read the leaked documents	jazzimov	Jun 2013	#29
My take on it, if I may.	scarletwoman	Jun 2013	#31
Thank you for that info. argh	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#33
You're welcome. In my opinion, we citizens really do need to discuss these matters.	scarletwoman	Jun 2013	#35
Exactly! +1	TeeYiYi	Jun 2013	#36
You raise very important points here	suffragette	Jun 2013	#37

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.