From what I've read, which isn't a lot, it seems what he revealed was already known, but again I (Reply #11)

In the discussion thread: I don't get the Snowden/phone records thing. Yes, been offline. [View all]

Sun Jun 23, 2013, 04:43 PM

11. From what I've read, which isn't a lot, it seems what he revealed was already known, but again I

have not read a lot which is why I am asking here. Are you saying that what you see is that Obama administration continued what was known and this is the issue? I am not sure.

Thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

37 replies	Author	Time	Post
I don't get the Snowden/phone records thing. Yes, been offline. [View all]	uppityperson	Jun 2013	OP
How dare you taunt those presently suffering from the vapors over things we have known for years. Nt	pkdu	Jun 2013	#1
True, we have known for years. But they want to prosecute him, revoked passport, and head of NSA	The Straight Story	Jun 2013	#4
I agree we still classify way too much as "secret"...on the other hand , confirming US and UK were	pkdu	Jun 2013	#6
From what I read, he did break the law. Not judging is the law is good or not, but just that he brok	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#12
Ah, but there is the problem I see	The Straight Story	Jun 2013	#17
"He (Snowden) exposed others breaking laws"	Cali_Democrat	Jun 2013	#20
Well, this would be a place to start:	The Straight Story	Jun 2013	#25
You need to get in touch with the Supreme Court right away	Ms. Toad	Jun 2013	#5
I am seeking info rather than desiring to turn yet another thread into useless snark. Thank you.	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#10
A little too much faux-outrage by Obama-bots for my taste	99th_Monkey	Jun 2013	#2
From what I've read, which isn't a lot, it seems what he revealed was already known, but again I	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#11
I think Snowden revealed the VAST EXTENT of spying on US citizens	99th_Monkey	Jun 2013	#15
Thank you, that makes sense. nt	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#16
It's a lot more than that, uppityperson.	Th1onein	Jun 2013	#3
Breaking News: US spy agencies...spy	NightWatcher	Jun 2013	#8
Right, thanks,	elleng	Jun 2013	#32
Thank you for the information as that part I hadn't heard. I appreciate your answering and	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#9
That's not entirely true.	jazzimov	Jun 2013	#27
Nope nothing new	NightWatcher	Jun 2013	#7
An attempt at a balanced appraisal	Recursion	Jun 2013	#13
Thank you. I appreciate the appraisal and information.	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#14
I would add #4: The FISA court secretly ruled some of what the NSA was doing	HardTimes99	Jun 2013	#18
I don't think that was him	Recursion	Jun 2013	#19
Ah, got you. It has all sort of blended together in my head, I'll readily grant. Also, possible #5	HardTimes99	Jun 2013	#21
Well, adding to the complexity, we don't know what came from BAH	Recursion	Jun 2013	#22
I think 'uppityperson' has his or her reading cut out for	HardTimes99	Jun 2013	#23
I think one thing that was revealed...	TeeYiYi	Jun 2013	#24
No. PRISM's name was revealed previously, and it's not a spy program	Recursion	Jun 2013	#26
Not according to the Boston Globe...	TeeYiYi	Jun 2013	#28
Then the Globe needs a better reporter	Recursion	Jun 2013	#30
Clandestine since 2007...	TeeYiYi	Jun 2013	#34
First, if you haven't already, read the leaked documents	jazzimov	Jun 2013	#29
My take on it, if I may.	scarletwoman	Jun 2013	#31
Thank you for that info. argh	uppityperson	Jun 2013	#33
You're welcome. In my opinion, we citizens really do need to discuss these matters.	scarletwoman	Jun 2013	#35
Exactly! +1	TeeYiYi	Jun 2013	#36
You raise very important points here	suffragette	Jun 2013	#37

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.