Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(11,464 posts)

27. No, the five that disented from what should have been if Al Gore won New Hampshire's 4 votes

Mon Jun 24, 2013, 03:56 PM

Jun 2013

so it is the 5 that dissented.

It could have been 6 to 3 by now, but NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO as someone used to say on SNL (can't remember who)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You mean the 5 in the majority cali Jun 2013 #2

ralph nader does not nominate supreme court injustices ya know nt msongs Jun 2013 #5

illogical conclusion based on irrational thinking noiretextatique Jun 2013 #11

Nader was right. Fuddnik Jun 2013 #13

Since when is Hillary a Democrat? Apophis Jun 2013 #8

That's a terrible misrepresentation of this case Yo_Mama Jun 2013 #3

so how do you explain such a different finding in Wyeth v Levine? cali Jun 2013 #10

Wyeth v Levine was a failure to warn claim hack89 Jun 2013 #19

It's quite a different issue, isn't it? Yo_Mama Jun 2013 #21

Fascinating, but what a horrific muddle it creates for consumers magellan Jun 2013 #12

I think this is an important case and Congress needs to act Yo_Mama Jun 2013 #24

Thanks, Yo. magellan Jun 2013 #28

Thank you for that cogent and pithy explaination telclaven Jun 2013 #14

so what about Wyeth v Levine? cali Jun 2013 #15

but is it an either/or quandary? cali Jun 2013 #20

that makes no sense. cali Jun 2013 #25

What part doesn't make sense? geek tragedy Jun 2013 #26

. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #6

all protection for the corporations, none for the people. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #16