General Discussion

Aerows

(39,961 posts)

33. Damn right. n/t

Reply to grasswire (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:38 PM

Jun 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

146 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The problem with defending Snowden. [View all] ProSense Jun 2013 OP

I have no problem with that-- sunlight is the best disinfectant... mike_c Jun 2013 #1

You may not have a problem with it, but ProSense Jun 2013 #2

Give it a rest, PS. bluedigger Jun 2013 #3

Oh look...another board nanny trying to regulate what's posted on DU Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #4

GMTA! Cha Jun 2013 #46

Lol, you crack me up! n-t Logical Jun 2013 #76

daily? More like every other hour or so. she's posted 75 Snowden ops. yep. 75 cali Jun 2013 #14

*snort* Skidmore Jun 2013 #24

I sure the hell haven't posted 75 ops about one person cali Jun 2013 #35

You know, every time one of you tries to shut ProSense down, I rec the read, Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #34

Thanks for the reminder, Denzil Hekate Jun 2013 #48

Hey look, another activated dormant account. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #53

Dormant? Another unfounded allegation. Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #67

Those who don't take part gain no standing, so when the fist thing they do is lecture Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #84

Luckily, it's not up to you to dictate how I or anybody else participate here, Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #90

Too bad you think so.. who are you to tell a member of a politcal board to Cha Jun 2013 #45

I don't think any of us were aware you were the story police. The sheer arrogance of your okaawhatever Jun 2013 #57

Why are her ops obsessive, when you don't call the many making him the karynnj Jun 2013 #128

Exactly....he's definitely not a "whistleblower" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #15

Bingo.... Historic NY Jun 2013 #111

He became disenchanted with the NSA spying, but hoped Obama would intervene siligut Jun 2013 #124

You know, you have to provide evidence if you are going to be successful siligut Jun 2013 #126

the problem with defending Snowden's rights... grasswire Jun 2013 #6

zing! Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #7

And you know that Snowden's detractors are all being paid because the little voice talking ... 11 Bravo Jun 2013 #8

Nobody *knows* it Bravo, but... you know... sibelian Jun 2013 #9

Only a few are being paid, those that have the biggest bang. Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #10

Prove to me that you aren't a hamster. Ikonoklast Jun 2013 #72

Bravo, you owe me some screen cleaner Hekate Jun 2013 #49

DAAAYYUM!!!!!! Number23 Jun 2013 #58

Sounded like a dog whistle to me. Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #79

Bravo Bravo. great white snark Jun 2013 #96

Karl Rove is probably DU's top $$$ contributor emulatorloo Jun 2013 #115

Good thing about democracy: Opinions are free ProSense Jun 2013 #12

once again Prosense is correct and sensible sigmasix Jun 2013 #119

Which of Snowden's rights are being violated? Please be specific. (nt) jeff47 Jun 2013 #19

People are just being crybabies because he's been called out for what he is davidpdx Jun 2013 #56

Damn right. n/t Aerows Jun 2013 #33

^^^ This RetroLounge Jun 2013 #66

Snowden is very naughty because he exposed the government (and corporation) snoops. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #11

the problem with defending killers who murder wedding parties using drones. msongs Jun 2013 #13

Dear God, you want a vegan president! aquart Jun 2013 #30

Are you seriously suggesting a binary choice? Vegan or murderous of large wedding parties? Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #87

Snowden is relevant Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #16

I'm impressed! 75 ops on Snowden from you in two weeks. cali Jun 2013 #17

Where did you get that number? n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #21

Equally impressive ... you have managed to respond to damned near all of them. 11 Bravo Jun 2013 #22

Okay, I swear I'm not stalking you but I was thinking the exact same thing Number23 Jun 2013 #59

Lots of stretch there. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #18

K & R Scurrilous Jun 2013 #20

One thing I haven't seen mentioned about Snowden at all justiceischeap Jun 2013 #23

No "probably" about it at all. Hekate Jun 2013 #51

Some folks on DU only see black or white justiceischeap Jun 2013 #60

This is exactly how I feel. Just Saying Jun 2013 #108

+1 tallahasseedem Jun 2013 #137

What a pathetic sense of morality you seem to have. You keep slamming a hero for the corporatists. In Truth We Trust Jun 2013 #25

Snowden plans more leaks...will let foreign press decide if leaks endanger Americans ProSense Jun 2013 #26

I guess this is an improvement from your usual... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #27

Well, ProSense Jun 2013 #28

I asked you a question... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #29

Yes ProSense Jun 2013 #31

"Yes ...you are. Enjoy" ljm2002 Jun 2013 #36

Again ProSense Jun 2013 #39

You're welcome... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #42

"Thanks, I will" bobduca Jun 2013 #86

I agree, it is spam and not discussion. The basic disrespect for others is just mean. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #93

Good luck. Flooding the board like this shouldn't be allowed. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #37

Thanks... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #43

its more than allowed bobduca Jun 2013 #88

So nice of you to kick this thread Hekate Jun 2013 #50

I'm pretty sure she's an SEO bot that's spun out of control. nt Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #113

LOL. Better an SEO bot than a CEO bot, I say! Still, good one! :) - nt HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #117

Its hard putting toothpaste back in the tube huh! nt galileoreloaded Jun 2013 #32

If you don't want to defend the constitution, you are playing on the wrong side. "I will support and grahamhgreen Jun 2013 #38

Snowden is irrelevant. (nt) nessa Jun 2013 #40

Is the DOJ prosecuting Cheney (Plame leaker) as a leaker or a whistleblower? Dr Fate Jun 2013 #41

I find that you are doing an awesome job. bravenak Jun 2013 #44

And, Leaker Snowden's mentor, Greenwald, has runny egg all over Cha Jun 2013 #47

And a few more dollars are deposited in ProSense's bank account. Gravitycollapse Jun 2013 #52

Alerted. Wonder if it gets to stand? Hekate Jun 2013 #61

Oooh, that was quick! I'm impressed. Hekate Jun 2013 #62

That's because people are tired of watching outright party shills manipulate information. Gravitycollapse Jun 2013 #63

Talk about manipulation Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #65

It means that she has taken a strong, content heavy, articulate stand that is karynnj Jun 2013 #129

I've been checking the snail-mail for my royalty checks. I'm soooo disappointed there aren't any. Hekate Jun 2013 #130

Obviously people are sick of it. n-t Logical Jun 2013 #80

I agree. As you'll see downthread, I disagree vehemently with ProSense on HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #118

That is courteous of you, and I appreciate it Hekate Jun 2013 #131

ACLU member here. We specialize in trying to protect the HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #136

May I shake your hand, then? Hekate Jun 2013 #138

Googlebombing is hard work bobduca Jun 2013 #112

Can you really be that clueless? Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #54

"By this metric, Manning isn't a whistleblower either. " ProSense Jun 2013 #68

Thought so. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #69

Must Bonobo Jun 2013 #55

Snowden SamKnause Jun 2013 #64

yummy yum more spam SwampG8r Jun 2013 #70

Eat up, and thanks for kicking the thread. ProSense Jun 2013 #71

Pro, since calling you a paid shill is now OK with DU's Angst Brigade, where can I sign up? Ikonoklast Jun 2013 #73

LOL! ProSense Jun 2013 #74

If you look at DU's site stats, traffic is way down, Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #81

Jesus, a new post to link to old posts! Spamming again! n-t Logical Jun 2013 #75

OMG ProSense Jun 2013 #77

Is it an attention deal for you? Seriously? Bumping own posts.... Logical Jun 2013 #78

I love it! ProSense Jun 2013 #82

There is no "problem" but for the one in your mind, IMNSHO. idwiyo Jun 2013 #83

"P.S. Your opinion is not the same as fact." ProSense Jun 2013 #85

I can only wish you were! Unfortunately you can not admit that your posts are nothing else but your idwiyo Jun 2013 #89

Actually ProSense Jun 2013 #92

I am looking forward to your next post where you'll admit its nothing else but your opinion. idwiyo Jun 2013 #95

Yeah, because it will be hard to tell, right? ProSense Jun 2013 #101

I am glad you can laugh at yourself. It's very refreshing. :) idwiyo Jun 2013 #105

The problem w/your point is you still haven't established Espionage, which requires proof leveymg Jun 2013 #91

The OP ProSense Jun 2013 #97

Of course it was premeditated - he didn't think it up after the fact or spill accidentally. Geez. leveymg Jun 2013 #102

What? n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #104

Of course he committed a premediated crime. You imply he was "spying" - Espionage - wrong, leveymg Jun 2013 #107

No, you're the one ProSense Jun 2013 #110

Quoting you: "I wasn't against Snowden and was laughing when people called him a spy but..." leveymg Jun 2013 #121

Actually, ProSense Jun 2013 #123

So that makes the little piece of innuendo about Espionage once removed, or twice? leveymg Jun 2013 #125

What? ProSense Jun 2013 #127

This is a distinction without a difference. Ellsberg's leak of the HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #94

No, ProSense Jun 2013 #100

If Ellsberg "went through the appropriate channels," then why was he prosecuted? Ellsberg HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #106

Are you ProSense Jun 2013 #109

Ellsberg himself justifies Snowden's actions. When you use a word like HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #114

Oh please ProSense Jun 2013 #116

I don't think I'm expressing myself or my feelings very clearly. I'm going to HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #120

"Appropriate Channels"? RobinA Jun 2013 #132

Kick & Rec BklnDem75 Jun 2013 #98

Too bad Greenwald is a former disgraced attorney and not a publicist. great white snark Jun 2013 #99

Disgraced? Are you implying Greenwald was disbarred? leveymg Jun 2013 #103

That's a YP, not an MP usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #122

YP, MP, I don't know all of this industry jargon. n/t hughee99 Jun 2013 #134

Couldn't resist usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #140

If you think what he claims is evidence of an illegal program, or of government abusing hughee99 Jun 2013 #133

Well, ProSense Jun 2013 #135

You can argue about this with respect to his credibility, hughee99 Jun 2013 #139

True, ProSense Jun 2013 #142

The problem with NOT defending Snowden... Octafish Jun 2013 #141

Oh, he's due a fair trial. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #143

Of course. Like Don Siegelman. Octafish Jun 2013 #144

Are you saying there are no fair trials? ProSense Jun 2013 #145

I'm saying that the Department of Justice railroaded Don Siegelman. Octafish Jun 2013 #146