Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

indepat

(20,899 posts)
49. Whoa! Where is this "The USA is not King of the World" coming from when the
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 06:10 PM
Jun 2013

King has already spoken and the King's word is the law of the World, plain and simple.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Clarify this for me nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #1
I didn't know they were surveilled in the 90s. Catherina Jun 2013 #2
And Christian charities. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #3
More like an Aircraft carrier. tblue Jun 2013 #25
They can join the ACLU and Amy Goodman, described here recentily as part of a pack of rat-fuckers. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #42
The question is "by whom?" No decent Democrat would do such a thing. Wow. n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #51
They Are Absolutist, Ma'am, In Their Particular Area The Magistrate Jun 2013 #5
So are they racists, or Paulites? nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #8
The Magistrate's shtick grew thin? That is so ironic coming from you in particular. LOL KittyWampus Jun 2013 #18
I just dropped the irony on my foot. Ikonoklast Jun 2013 #23
A little confused sir.... daleanime Jun 2013 #33
Are you a Thurgood Marshall fan? JDPriestly Jun 2013 #36
The US only cares about International law when it suits them. liberal_at_heart Jun 2013 #4
Brings back memories of the UN and the Iraq war...... think Jun 2013 #14
What? ProSense Jun 2013 #6
Haven't realized what you are defending yet have you? dkf Jun 2013 #10
LOL! There was nothing "unlawful" about the program. ProSense Jun 2013 #11
Are you kidding me? You think that what North Korea does isn't legal in their country? dkf Jun 2013 #13
No, and ProSense Jun 2013 #15
Human rights don't have anything to do with any countries laws. That's the point. dkf Jun 2013 #17
Definition of Human Rights is international Savannahmann Jun 2013 #20
+++ marions ghost Jun 2013 #35
Hey! Of course the GCHQ program is unlawful - are you kidding? temmer Jun 2013 #21
It is unconstitutional. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #37
That is a logical deduction if one believes that... bvar22 Jun 2013 #12
out of someone`s ass.... madrchsod Jun 2013 #29
this is getting deep :O. allin99 Jun 2013 #7
Ecuador is a sovereign nation.... bvar22 Jun 2013 #16
yeah, but you know how the u.s. gets a little nutso... allin99 Jun 2013 #22
The US has been "screwing" Latin American countries for over a century. bvar22 Jun 2013 #48
Whoa! Where is this "The USA is not King of the World" coming from when the indepat Jun 2013 #49
The administration is showing great audacity in digging the hole deeper it's stuck in. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #9
of course not, the facist scum. those govt thugs are just pissed they got caught. boilerbabe Jun 2013 #19
K&R. I have said it before, Snowden deserves the presidential medal of freedom quinnox Jun 2013 #24
Amnesty SamKnause Jun 2013 #26
If rendition, torture, and executive authorized execution of American citizens is legal... wundermaus Jun 2013 #27
"The organization noted that an individual cannot be extradited East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #28
And revealing details of activities against other countries is espionage intaglio Jun 2013 #30
Read Thurgood Marshall's dissent in Smith v. Maryland. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #38
As it was a dissent ... n/t intaglio Jun 2013 #43
Dissents can become decisions -- when the facts change. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #44
Yup, but at the moment it remains a dissent. n/t intaglio Jun 2013 #45
But we should bring it to everyone's attention because explains why JDPriestly Jun 2013 #47
No it explains why those 2 Justices in that particular opinion intaglio Jun 2013 #50
But the situation in that case was not at all similar to what is being done now. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #53
Oddly I do not defend the practise intaglio Jun 2013 #56
This program most definitely chills not only speech but freedom JDPriestly Jun 2013 #61
Has it stifled your free speech? intaglio Jun 2013 #62
It has stifled your free speech and the free speech of every person JDPriestly Jun 2013 #63
How? intaglio Jun 2013 #64
Watch this video. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #65
But, as Marshall pointed out, while the case handles a Fourth Amendment JDPriestly Jun 2013 #55
AI...pull your head out of your ass. SoapBox Jun 2013 #31
People who tell Amnesty International to "STFU" Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #32
So we've found who you go in lockstep with treestar Jun 2013 #67
What does that have to do with anything? Hissyspit Jun 2013 #34
Well we haven't drop down to the level of a Russia goolag or re-education camp of China gitmo is pam4water Jun 2013 #39
The lines are being drawn between the authoritarians and the liberals, looks like you choose the rhett o rick Jun 2013 #60
Amnesty International to be declared an evil commie traitor organization in 3...2...1... n/t backscatter712 Jun 2013 #40
The United States is going to pursue Snowden. timdog44 Jun 2013 #41
Amnesty International is entitled to release whatever statement they wish... MattFromKY Jun 2013 #46
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #52
regarding Manning's treatment, G_j Jun 2013 #54
AI has most credibility when they refer to international law supported by international treaties struggle4progress Jun 2013 #57
K&R. pacalo Jun 2013 #58
K&R idwiyo Jun 2013 #59
What human rights violations? treestar Jun 2013 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Amnesty International: US...»Reply #49