General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)I thought Gregory actually got Greenwald [View all]
Gregory: "To the extent that you have aided and abetted Snowden even in his current movements why shouldnt you, Mr. Greenwald, be charged with a crime?"
Greenwald: "...The assumption in your question, David, is completely without evidence the idea Ive aided and abetted him in any way..."
Greenwald didn't say he hadn't "aided and abetted" Snowden. He said that such an assumption was "without evidence." Why the evasion? Why not just say "I didn't aide and abet Snowden?" He could have added whatever indignation he wanted to after that.
Simply put, Gregory asked a question a lot of people wanted answered, and Greenwald decided to pound the table and evade rather than answer it. He wanted Gregory shouted down. But folks, Greenwald made himself news and put himself in whatever legal jeopardy he may be in. If he did more for Snowden than use him has a source, Greenwald may be looking at some unpleasantness in his future.
Gregory asked a "newsmaker" a very, very relevant question. It cut to the chase and it scored. Greenwald's thespian skills aside, he didn't answer the question. That's a win for Gregory, well in bounds.