Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tsk tsk Rachel Maddow: 16 min on Snowden's flight, 0 on NSA. [View all]malaise
(296,114 posts)5. At least Chris Hayes covered both n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Was STUNNED that Mrs. Greenspan was her only guest for the segment. Disturbing.
chimpymustgo
Jun 2013
#76
We have posters on DU simultaneously saying we've known about this since 2006 or 1996 or 1776
Fumesucker
Jun 2013
#90
So where are you regarding "sunlight" on the massive Inte""lligence Empire and their...
grasswire
Jun 2013
#16
Well, I'm definitely in favor of sunlight. you know. shining on things. that are hidden. n/t
yodermon
Jun 2013
#19
The issue is Snowden being a criminal and should be completely exposed for what he is...
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#27
no, the issue is unfettered powers that will be utilized long after obama is out of the WH..
frylock
Jun 2013
#29
The republicans* will switch to complaining about lack of jobs like they have for five years
Kolesar
Jun 2013
#43
Time to throw Maddow under the bus, she's not bowing at the alter of Snowden
uponit7771
Jun 2013
#82
yeah, because a guy running off to russia with a shitload of US intel is totally NOT a story.
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#62
So, he stole top secret info, but fucked it up in his leak to Greenwald/WAPO ("wild claims"),however
yodermon
Jun 2013
#25
How do you know the stuff he's (supposedly) giving the other countries is accurate, while
yodermon
Jun 2013
#32
I enjoy Maddow very much - but she is a loyal Party apparatchik - a very talented and entertaining
Douglas Carpenter
Jun 2013
#22
+1. and it's been pretty much clear from day 1. never could understand the rachel-fanboys/girls.
HiPointDem
Jun 2013
#38
Oh, Octafish. Cutting right to the chase. Thanks for keeping it real, Bro.
chimpymustgo
Jun 2013
#77
Right because Rachel hasn't covered ANYTHING about the NSA business at all, ever, right?
phleshdef
Jun 2013
#64
So there can be no story on his continued evasion without = time on the agency?
themaguffin
Jun 2013
#73