General Discussion

frylock

(34,825 posts)

12. yeah, fuck them, right?

Reply to JaneyVee (Reply #9)

Mon Jun 24, 2013, 11:04 PM

Jun 2013

they'll just be begging us for partnership and allied support in our next great imperialistic adventure.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Uh-Oh! The rest of the world is pissed at us! [View all] Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 OP

LOL "Linkasaurus Rex" ...forever drowning in a sea of links. L0oniX Jun 2013 #1

yeah, kinda surreal huh? CountAllVotes Jun 2013 #2

And There's This: WillyT Jun 2013 #3

Well we have the Brits. boston bean Jun 2013 #4

Yes, I know. sibelian Jun 2013 #43

Jesus! A not so veiled call out of another DUer? longship Jun 2013 #5

The truth is a valid defense against accusations of slander LondonReign2 Jun 2013 #73

I come here ProSense Jun 2013 #6

The hell you do... RetroLounge Jun 2013 #44

SNORT hootinholler Jun 2013 #71

lmao!!! darkangel218 Jun 2013 #82

Linkasaurus Rex bigwillq Jun 2013 #7

I guess Linkasaurus Rex is gonna have to buy Rosetta Stone before unleashing the dreaded blue linkie Cha Jun 2013 #8

Somebody lost their posting privileges for a day because the jury wouldn't hide this blatant call Number23 Jun 2013 #10

Now we know which side "the swarm" is really on. bunnies Jun 2013 #49

Hosts won't lock it either... SidDithers Jun 2013 #60

You have to forgive them ProSense Jun 2013 #18

I should just ignore their ugly ignorance.. Cha Jun 2013 #29

They're spying on us, so we're spying on them. Lets see how "pissed" they are at us when JaneyVee Jun 2013 #9

yeah, fuck them, right? frylock Jun 2013 #12

Why shouldn't we spy on them if they're spying on us? JaneyVee Jun 2013 #13

why shouldn't they spy on us if we're spying on them? frylock Jun 2013 #14

They are, and we are. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #15

so what's beef? frylock Jun 2013 #16

You're the one who said "fuck them", not me. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #20

i was merely echoing your sentiment frylock Jun 2013 #21

It's OK to admit when you're wrong. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #22

i'll circle back later to see if you do just that.. frylock Jun 2013 #25

You were the one who assumed my intentions. You know what they say about assuming. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #30

"Lets see how "pissed" they are at us when they're begging us for partnership and allied support." frylock Jun 2013 #32

I have no problem saying fuck you when I mean fuck you, but I didn't say that now did I? JaneyVee Jun 2013 #34

so what precisely did you mean by your post? frylock Jun 2013 #40

Who's "they"? magellan Jun 2013 #17

Why spy? Isn't this administration in trouble for NOT prosecuting anyone for the frauds that caused patrice Jun 2013 #64

Are you seriously suggesting we're only spying on the world magellan Jun 2013 #81

My GOD! railsback Jun 2013 #11

We need MORE links, not fewer. jazzimov Jun 2013 #19

what we need is more links that lead to more links that lead to more posts full of links.. frylock Jun 2013 #23

Careful, you might set up a singularity of links there nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #24

LOL! ProSense Jun 2013 #27

Here: ProSense Jun 2013 #26

When links only go to your previously expressed opinions Demit Jun 2013 #35

Oh ProSense Jun 2013 #37

Isn't previously expressed opinions old news? zeemike Jun 2013 #39

No, linking to oneself isn't horror. It's just lacking in substance. Demit Jun 2013 #41

And ProSense Jun 2013 #47

Nope. Not going to click on your link. You can continue referencing yourself Demit Jun 2013 #50

Gee, thanks for your permission. ProSense Jun 2013 #53

Personally, I don't mind people trying to provide context for their posts. This is an asynchronous patrice Jun 2013 #65

I do appreciate when writers link to sources outside themselves to provide facts. Demit Jun 2013 #68

Face it, ProSense Jun 2013 #69

No, I'm not upset because I don't agree w/a pov. What I am is contemptuous of lazy writing. Demit Jun 2013 #75

No ProSense Jun 2013 #77

Oh, good lord. No they are not. Demit Jun 2013 #78

You ProSense Jun 2013 #79

It is a little tough to post links backing your misinformation, NorthCarolina Jul 2013 #84

I don't often agree with Prosense, but there is no reason mock her in an OP. ZombieHorde Jun 2013 #28

Thank, you don't have to agree with me, but ProSense Jun 2013 #31

Keep 'em coming malaise Jun 2013 #46

Thanks ProSense Jun 2013 #48

seek help for your... one_voice Jun 2013 #33

LOL Arctic Dave Jun 2013 #36

The Great Unraveling DeSwiss Jun 2013 #38

More Weaksaucesarus Rex for the trash can. HappyMe Jun 2013 #42

"Linkasaurus Rex" RetroLounge Jun 2013 #45

LMAO!!! darkangel218 Jun 2013 #51

. ProSense Jun 2013 #52

Ok Ms LR darkangel218 Jun 2013 #54

. ProSense Jun 2013 #55

Glad you admit that you were :p darkangel218 Jun 2013 #56

Haha! treestar Jun 2013 #62

Too late, they are already here... With more links, of course! idwiyo Jun 2013 #61

This is digusting. bunnies Jun 2013 #57

K&R for using "Linkasaurus Rex" in this great post! idwiyo Jun 2013 #58

troll food carolinayellowdog Jun 2013 #59

Lmao!! Im still laughing!! darkangel218 Jun 2013 #63

Linking is liberating, because it builds autonomous cognition, but I wouldn't expect a one-toothed patrice Jun 2013 #66

I'll make a note that call-outs are great in GD. HappyMe Jun 2013 #67

LMAO @ Linkasaurus Rex .... Myrina Jun 2013 #70

DUzy for Linkasarus Rex hootinholler Jun 2013 #72

DUzy for ProSense Jun 2013 #74

Hey, it's not about issues hootinholler Jun 2013 #80

It can be frustrating when someone presents opinions and conclusion LanternWaste Jun 2013 #76

Nice personal attack/callout. Scurrilous Jul 2013 #83

k & r & thanks to.... wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #85