Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
10. they selected by phenotype, not genotype
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 01:12 AM
Jun 2013

the expression of genes, rather than genes themselves, were the focus of the study because, really, there is no one single gene that explains most any behavior. Genes live in communities, just as humans do, and their expressions are influenced by their communities.

what the study indicates, it seems to me, is that, amazingly, in only 50 years, a major behavioral change was bred, in two different directions.

Within one lifetime, iow, domestication of a species may have been accomplished by an observant group or groups of humans.

This might also be considered a behavioral sort of "founder effect" - a small population breeds among itself and particular traits arise from that small population. These foxes could still interbreed, but the basis of the founder effect as an issue in biology is a change in gene expression because of a small population that, eventually, is geographically isolated, etc. and, even more eventually, creates a new species.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tamed fox shows domestica...»Reply #10