Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
45. Eh, very good, but satire is too faint to expect anyone to get it.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 01:40 AM
Jun 2013

Not exactly satire fail, but buyer beware, and not quite cricket. JMHO

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A link to Greenwald's tweet - he's worked with Snowden since FEBRUARY, below Tx4obama Jun 2013 #1
Said the professional butt-coverer! MNBrewer Jun 2013 #2
1) Month corrected. Thanks. 2) You are utterly dishonest. cthulu2016 Jun 2013 #3
Taking into consideration what they are trying to defend, lying is the only option left for them. idwiyo Jun 2013 #5
Indeed. I'm thinking Greenwald finally figured out his civil liability, and might have msanthrope Jun 2013 #6
How about as a lawyer, leftynyc Jun 2013 #65
I don't think he has a license to lawyer anywhere, and more importantly, that obligation you msanthrope Jun 2013 #68
Knowing about a crime leftynyc Jun 2013 #69
no, he was not acting as a lawyer then still_one Jun 2013 #78
So? I read that when he tweeted it originally and hadn't forgotten it. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #11
But he never said he knew who he was, did he? He did work with him. Snowden had an internet handle sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #46
Let the backpedalling begin! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2013 #4
Cthulu, only someone whose name is "impossible for truedelphi Jun 2013 #7
The boggers have jumped the shark Doctor_J Jun 2013 #8
I disagree with Obama on his marijuana policy. MattFromKY Jun 2013 #10
I think there should be a trial. burnodo Jun 2013 #38
nevermind.. one_voice Jun 2013 #18
"the boggers"? To whom are you referring? KittyWampus Jun 2013 #22
I believe he is referring to Summer Hathaway Jun 2013 #52
I thought it was slang for "blind obedient groupies". Don't they like follow the bus around Dragonfli Jun 2013 #54
Has Snowden come up with that Summer Hathaway Jun 2013 #55
I see an issue with an out of control surveillance industry merged with an out of control Dragonfli Jun 2013 #57
Out of control how? Summer Hathaway Jun 2013 #58
Do you ever read? The news is all over the world, men who worked directly for NSA Dragonfli Jun 2013 #59
When you miss a point Summer Hathaway Jun 2013 #81
I wish there were leftynyc Jun 2013 #66
"possible for people to communicate without conveying their name" MattFromKY Jun 2013 #9
Of course it was pre-planned. All Whistle Blowers pre-plan how to get the information they have sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #47
Can you post the part leftynyc Jun 2013 #67
Actual, although it was 'secret' up to recently, there is a ruling by the FISA court itself that sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #70
I asked for the link leftynyc Jun 2013 #71
Surely you can find the Constitution on Google? sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #73
I just knew you were spouting bullshit leftynyc Jun 2013 #74
Domestic spying is illegal. Show me where that has changed. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #75
LOL - and where is THAT leftynyc Jun 2013 #76
OK, I'm going to be horrible now and look like a bit of a pedant. sibelian Jun 2013 #56
I feel the same way about "irregardless" (that one drives me bonkers) Dragonfli Jun 2013 #60
"Irregardless" of your admonition, they will continue to do it! Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #80
Greenwald conspired with a Spy to attain National Secrets. He's toast. MjolnirTime Jun 2013 #12
Yes, well Hissyspit Jun 2013 #13
why did Glenn delete his tweet about working with Snowden since February MjolnirTime Jun 2013 #14
He didn't, as far as I can tell. I looked it up on Twitter just a little while ago. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Hissyspit Jun 2013 #20
Stop. Liar time. The Link Jun 2013 #23
Did you mean to respond to Mjolnr? Hissyspit Jun 2013 #37
Either or. Just verifying that the tweet had not been deleted. The Link Jun 2013 #62
"Have at thee!" nt Bonobo Jun 2013 #26
Where did you get this information from? With no credible source to back up your sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #48
I know your real name. And where you work. DirkGently Jun 2013 #16
Great,...now the NSA has you tagged as owning a pressure cooker. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #33
I just put them on IGNORE. DeSwiss Jun 2013 #17
So you are not that monster that causes insanity at Rackham? nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #19
It's sad some on DU can't see ratfucking when it happens. And for you to use the term KittyWampus Jun 2013 #21
you keep using that term like you actually know what it means frylock Jun 2013 #24
That was my reaction too. truedelphi Jun 2013 #50
these people are still convinced this is some nefarious plot cooked up by karl rove.. frylock Jun 2013 #72
KittyWampus suspicions = facts cthulu2016 Jun 2013 #28
What is the root of your apparent beastiality fixation? Do you even know who ratfuckers were? Dragonfli Jun 2013 #44
Snowden has been convicted already?? That was fast! sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #49
Yes! "The press has special protections in democracies and for very good reason." Demit Jun 2013 #61
That word does not mean what you think it means. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #51
Perhaps there is something else about Greenwald that inspires such hatred and derision? The Link Jun 2013 #25
+1 QC Jun 2013 #79
This. Starry Messenger Jun 2013 #83
Well, ProSense Jun 2013 #27
Oh God... you actually went with THAT??? cthulu2016 Jun 2013 #31
Yes, ProSense Jun 2013 #34
?????? Number23 Jun 2013 #53
SOP for cautious leakers who contact journalists Babel_17 Jun 2013 #29
Deep Throat probably did. (I think he knew Woodward) cthulu2016 Jun 2013 #32
Wikipedia basically says yes Babel_17 Jun 2013 #36
Personally, I thought it smelled like a big ol' steamin' cup o' frantic. No surprise though. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #30
Greenwald Lies, Snowden Hides.. Grassy Knoll Jun 2013 #35
What lie? Hissyspit Jun 2013 #39
Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #40
No, I'm just asking questions like a normal person at DU Hissyspit Jun 2013 #41
Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Hissyspit Jun 2013 #43
Eh, very good, but satire is too faint to expect anyone to get it. ucrdem Jun 2013 #45
Here's the real satire: Hissyspit Jun 2013 #82
Oooh, internet anti-Greenwald agitators... SidDithers Jun 2013 #63
Well I saw a new claim in a reply to a post of mine Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #64
QUITE intellectually dishonest, chthulhu. sibelian Jun 2013 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Internet anti-Greenwald a...»Reply #45