Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(53,346 posts)

4. No but he shouldn't have been a lying pos

Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:28 AM

Jun 2013

He got money from lots of people by promising he wouldn't campaign in swing states which he then did.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So... Ralph Nader should have foregone his right to run [View all] whatchamacallit Jun 2013 OP

Yeah, and the voting decision by the SCOTUS today was Obama's fault Kolesar Jun 2013 #1

Democracy is fine, as long as there are only two parties involved. Apophis Jun 2013 #2

Exactly whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #3

It seems like many folks here think that. bigwillq Jun 2013 #5

No but he shouldn't have been a lying pos dsc Jun 2013 #4

+1...nt SidDithers Jun 2013 #14

Depends. What was his goal? Recursion Jun 2013 #7

It's fucked up..... Marrah_G Jun 2013 #8

Absolutely not! riqster Jun 2013 #9

Nader has a lot of rights. So did Bush and Cheney! Democat Jun 2013 #10

What's with the Nader Hate today? I thought that was Fridays n/t leftstreet Jun 2013 #12

as far as I'm concerned EC Jun 2013 #13

he should go to hell arely staircase Jun 2013 #15