General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ralph Nader ABSOLUTELY Helped Cost President Gore the Election in 2000 despite these revisionists [View all]beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)...it's the presupposition on the part of the Gore apologists that the Democrats are entitled to our votes.
After all, if you don't assume that the Democrats are entitled to our votes, you can't argue that Nader somehow 'stole' those same votes from the Democrats. This is rank hubris, and frankly, the Republicans know better than to shit all over their base the way the Democrats, in 2000, had spent the previous 8 years doing.
You want to make this about a few thousand votes? Anyone on here remember the PMRC? A hell of a lot of people my age (40) do, and I'll bet the memories of that ignominious episode cost Al Gore a lot more votes from my generation than Nader could have dreamed of.
You want to make this about revisionism? Al Gore now is a hell of a lot better (i.e. more liberal) than Al Gore circa 2000. I would happily vote for Gore 2013. Gore 2000, not so much.