Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
18. I don't think so...otherwise why have delegates and why not just use the voters results?
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 10:30 AM
Feb 2012


It would appear, the delegates just take cues from the votes

These delegates are supposed to take their cue from the voters who cast ballots during their states' primaries and caucuses, though each party's rules make it possible for multiple rounds of balloting and horse trading if no candidate is able to gain a majority on the first ballot. But since 1976, no major party convention has opened with the identity of the nominee in question.
<snip>
During the primary process, "the party is choosing their candidates, which is very different from the public choosing a candidate," says Norman Ornstein, an expert on U.S. politics at the American Enterprise Institute think tank. The goal is to "narrow it down to the candidates who most represent the party, and who have the greatest chance of winning," says Ornstein. At least, he says, "That's the theory. It doesn't always work that way."


Each state make various decisions as to how they hold or re-vote in primaries. There is wiggle room for sure.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»PPP: Santorum leads Romn...»Reply #18