Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
18. That definition is, by definition, knee-jerk...
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 05:59 PM
Jun 2013

...ignoring as it does the possibility of multiple levels of loyalty. Absolute adherence to the letter of Snowden's contract and/or his oath might conflict with each other, and both of those with his loyalty to our interests.

I can't prove that Snowden's were all altruistic, but if he can ultimately be said to have acted much more in support of the Constitution than he did against specific regulations, the word "traitor" would be seen as the simplistic label it is--at this point, at least, before we know what he has done and why.

You and I may have much cause to change our opinions before we learn all we are allowed to learn. Why make up our minds in the first two weeks?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Traitor Exception Clause:...»Reply #18