Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)

12. I believe that you approached your work as you stated.

Reply to warrprayer (Reply #10)

Tue Jun 25, 2013, 06:35 PM

Jun 2013

However, a private corporation is ultimately only accountable to its shareholders.

We have better protections and accountability when we have government employees do the work.
And why should the government pay twice the price to an outside contractors? Ridiculous.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Price put on Snowdens Head [View all] warrprayer Jun 2013 OP

We should get Dog and Beth right on it... Bandit Jun 2013 #1

as Moby Dick taught me... warrprayer Jun 2013 #2

Good one! Marie Marie Jun 2013 #3

Snowden will probably wish warrprayer Jun 2013 #4

sincere apologies warrprayer Jun 2013 #5

Or maybe get rid of fraudulent contractors who do their background invs NightWatcher Jun 2013 #6

you can bet they are going to warrprayer Jun 2013 #7

Maybe we should get some gov'ment reps who uphold the Constitution. avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #8

The assumptions on DU never fail me.. HipChick Jun 2013 #9

you are correct warrprayer Jun 2013 #11

I worked as very low level contractor warrprayer Jun 2013 #10

I believe that you approached your work as you stated. avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #12

I may be mistaken warrprayer Jun 2013 #13

I think he'll be irrelevant soon enough flamingdem Jun 2013 #14

not to worry warrprayer Jun 2013 #15