Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tsk tsk Rachel Maddow: 16 min on Snowden's flight, 0 on NSA. [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)80. All of DU has been obsessed
It's the kind of thing people get interested in. thus one's thread with cites of the law of Fourth Amendment national security aspects will sink while all wonder where Eddie is.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Was STUNNED that Mrs. Greenspan was her only guest for the segment. Disturbing.
chimpymustgo
Jun 2013
#76
We have posters on DU simultaneously saying we've known about this since 2006 or 1996 or 1776
Fumesucker
Jun 2013
#90
So where are you regarding "sunlight" on the massive Inte""lligence Empire and their...
grasswire
Jun 2013
#16
Well, I'm definitely in favor of sunlight. you know. shining on things. that are hidden. n/t
yodermon
Jun 2013
#19
The issue is Snowden being a criminal and should be completely exposed for what he is...
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#27
no, the issue is unfettered powers that will be utilized long after obama is out of the WH..
frylock
Jun 2013
#29
The republicans* will switch to complaining about lack of jobs like they have for five years
Kolesar
Jun 2013
#43
Time to throw Maddow under the bus, she's not bowing at the alter of Snowden
uponit7771
Jun 2013
#82
yeah, because a guy running off to russia with a shitload of US intel is totally NOT a story.
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#62
So, he stole top secret info, but fucked it up in his leak to Greenwald/WAPO ("wild claims"),however
yodermon
Jun 2013
#25
How do you know the stuff he's (supposedly) giving the other countries is accurate, while
yodermon
Jun 2013
#32
I enjoy Maddow very much - but she is a loyal Party apparatchik - a very talented and entertaining
Douglas Carpenter
Jun 2013
#22
+1. and it's been pretty much clear from day 1. never could understand the rachel-fanboys/girls.
HiPointDem
Jun 2013
#38
Oh, Octafish. Cutting right to the chase. Thanks for keeping it real, Bro.
chimpymustgo
Jun 2013
#77
Right because Rachel hasn't covered ANYTHING about the NSA business at all, ever, right?
phleshdef
Jun 2013
#64
So there can be no story on his continued evasion without = time on the agency?
themaguffin
Jun 2013
#73