Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Greenwald's Timeline Problem [View all]Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)32. You do know that Greenwald has both a publisher and an editor and that they are the ones who
sent them out there. Obviously, the Guardian, a well-respected news organization, saw merit and decided that, based on the samples, they needed to investigate further.
Greenwald did do due diligence and so did the Washington Post whose reporter Bart Gellman received the same 20 sample documents and made the decision to pursue the Prism story, as well.
I don't think you know what the word "dump" means.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Either that, or he disregards all convention to chase a story which fits his agenda.
OilemFirchen
Jun 2013
#9
No he did not. He received 20 samples in mid-May and based on those samples the Guardian sent him to
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#23
You do know that Greenwald has both a publisher and an editor and that they are the ones who
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#32
I don't think Greenwald has a license to practice law anywhere. His last foray of note into the
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#13
No idea. He's still in the club, though, even though he's on the Naughty Chair. nt
MADem
Jun 2013
#25
Do you also doubt Bart Gellman of the Washington Post. He also claims that he communicated
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#18
Defending yourself and your profession against multiple calls for prosecution and accusations
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#29
Because Snowden just said he specifically took the job to get his hands on classified documents
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2013
#17
We didn't know, at that time, that Snowden had averred he joined BAH specifically to steal stuff. nt
MADem
Jun 2013
#19
does this mean there really is no surveillance state that we have to be concerned about?
Douglas Carpenter
Jun 2013
#31