Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
155. Z did not ignore instructions from the dispatcher.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 09:14 PM
Jun 2013

Testimony has already established that when the dispatcher said, "We don't need you to do that." Z was already following TM. He quit when the dispatcher told him that. The dispatcher NEVER told him to stay in his vehicle. The dispatcher asked him which way TM had gone. Z had lost sight of TM and interpreted the dispatchers question as a request that he find out which way TM had gone.

Z did ignore neighborhood watch protocol. Their protocol is to avoid confrontations, stay in your vehicle where it is safer.

Assume for a moment that TM actually was casing homes for burglary while walking home. I AM NOT SAYING THAT HE ACTUALLY WAS DOING THAT, I AM SHOWING HOW Z WAS WRONG. Z spots a suspicious person and calls the non-emergency number of the police. TM sees Z in his truck and walks towards him, then turns and runs. At that point Z has done what neighborhood watch is supposed to do. TM has seen that he has been observed and will likely cool it on burglarizing local homes. Z can sit in his truck for a few minutes, give the police a good description, then go about his business. Nobody gets hurt. Instead, when Z got out of the truck, he blew it.

Unfortunately, it wasn't against the law for Z to get out of his truck, nor did the dispatcher tell him not to.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ZIMMERMAN TRIAL: Day 2, Tuesday, June 25. [View all] GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 OP
Crime scene technician taking the stand. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #1
No reaction at all to seeing the body of the kid he shot to death. bunnies Jun 2013 #2
Particularly Zimmerman. Just another day of being subjected to this persecution. pacalo Jun 2013 #7
Yeah. Poor baby. My heart bleeds. bunnies Jun 2013 #11
Apparently Trayvon's mom had to excuse herself a couple of times. nt Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #8
I can imagine. bunnies Jun 2013 #14
no reaction to anything. Just that sad puppy look and blinking KurtNYC Jun 2013 #10
no kidding. bunnies Jun 2013 #13
Thanks for doing this. n/t winter is coming Jun 2013 #3
Any knock knock jokes or other "zingers" today? Erose999 Jun 2013 #4
Not a single bruise on Trayvons hands! bunnies Jun 2013 #5
Medically there is some question whether bruises would have had a chance to form Lurks Often Jun 2013 #20
Fair enough. bunnies Jun 2013 #21
Or it means Zimmerman never got a punch in. Lurks Often Jun 2013 #22
Or he didnt bother to try to. bunnies Jun 2013 #23
The general rule is that one can use deadly force when you are in fear of Lurks Often Jun 2013 #24
Can you prove that he had his head struck against the pavement repeatedly? bunnies Jun 2013 #25
EMT's report Lurks Often Jun 2013 #26
If I have a broken wrist... bunnies Jun 2013 #27
True, but the burden is on the State to prove Lurks Often Jun 2013 #31
Why was none of Zimmy's blood or skin or dna found on Trayvon? uppityperson Jun 2013 #32
Don't know Lurks Often Jun 2013 #35
For all I know, bunnies Jun 2013 #36
It will almost certainly prove to be interesting trial n/t Lurks Often Jun 2013 #38
Do you have any evidence that Z's wounds are self-inflected? GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #43
Hence the use of the word *could* bunnies Jun 2013 #44
I do not consider wild speculaton to be helpful. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #46
Thanks for joining in the discussion, then. bunnies Jun 2013 #47
it was TRAYVON who was fighting for his life Skittles Jun 2013 #85
That is for the trial to determine. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #93
Only one person was pursuing another person. grantcart Jun 2013 #224
Hard to do that if you are on your back being beaten. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #226
Yes I understand that. grantcart Jun 2013 #227
I agree with you. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #229
I agree with you. Just Saying Jun 2013 #49
Sorry but the state doesn't have to prove a negative. Just Saying Jun 2013 #56
I don't think I am so much defending Zimmerman as Lurks Often Jun 2013 #66
Wrong, Zimmerman has to prove it was self defense Bjorn Against Jun 2013 #68
Incorrect. If he had invoked the Stand Your Ground defense Lurks Often Jun 2013 #69
It's actually a Use of Deadly Force defense. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #73
And we're right back we're we started Lurks Often Jun 2013 #74
If it only struck once or twice, I would say no. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #76
And now you are back to an unproven theory to base the rest on. uppityperson Jun 2013 #77
You are wrong, all claims of self defense are an affirmative defense Bjorn Against Jun 2013 #88
It seems an open mind would see that an unarmed kid Just Saying Jun 2013 #96
Quite simply none of us have seen all of the evidence. Lurks Often Jun 2013 #103
If Martin thought his life was in jeopardy, he had no right to put Zimmy in a position uppityperson Jun 2013 #108
The fear has to realistic. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #115
Zimmy can shoot Trayvon to stop him, but Trayvon can't knock Zimmy down to stop him? Oh. Kay. uppityperson Jun 2013 #119
Knock down, yes. ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #124
Ah, and there it is. You believe Zimmy's claim about that. uppityperson Jun 2013 #129
Not sure how you jump to any conclusion about what I ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #141
That is not what I said. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #130
And you believe Zimmy's take on that. I don't. No blood or injuries on Trayvon showing he did that. uppityperson Jun 2013 #132
And how did Zimmerman put Martin in fear of his life? Lurks Often Jun 2013 #116
Stalking a 17 yr old on a dark night might do it. There were no injuries on Trayvon's hands that uppityperson Jun 2013 #117
Being followed on a dark night might make you scared, ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #123
I agree, it does. It certainly can. eom uppityperson Jun 2013 #131
Typo in my post may change your agreement. ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #139
You may wish to check the autopsy report. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #134
A 1/4 by 1/8 inch abrasion of unknown age on 17 yr old's 4th finger knuckle. And he supposedly was uppityperson Jun 2013 #174
I have a hard time understanding an armed man fearing for his life. Just Saying Jun 2013 #121
The dispatcher also said that it was a suggestion and not an order Lurks Often Jun 2013 #127
I don't know what the legality of what a dispatcher tells someone. Just Saying Jun 2013 #133
According to the dispatcher's testimony Lurks Often Jun 2013 #136
So what gave Zimmerman the "authority" to follow/stalk somebody with a gun? nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #153
One needs no authority to follow someone. ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #154
That's why I put "authority" in quotes. As in, what the hell was his justification? nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #157
Z says he followed Martin because Martin was acting suspicious. ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #159
Suspicious how? Wasn't he just walking back to his father's house from the store? nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #161
I take it you did not follow the previous media reports? ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #162
But once again, you're leaning heavily on Zimmerman's account of things. nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #166
I am not leaning on anything. You asked for Z's reasoning. ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #167
Okay. Fair enough. I'm not upset with you or anything. nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #168
I think that the problem most people have with this case ManiacJoe Jun 2013 #169
Z also said TM looked like he was on drugs and those assholes always get away. uppityperson Jun 2013 #176
nothing but fear and ignorance Skittles Jun 2013 #194
He didn't need any authority Lurks Often Jun 2013 #235
Trayvon went to the store for ice tea and Skittles Skittles Jun 2013 #252
Z quit following when the dispatcher said that it wasn't needed. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #158
I don't believe he stopped following Trayvon. n/t Just Saying Jun 2013 #173
I guess my only question is, why are you so quick to believe Zimmerman's version of things? nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #152
I didn't say I believe him Lurks Often Jun 2013 #232
Trayvon is dead. Zimmerman killed him. That makes Zimmerman a murderer. Not in question. LiberalAndProud Jun 2013 #240
There is a very important legal difference between murder and killing Lurks Often Jun 2013 #241
This will determine if he will be held accountable. LiberalAndProud Jun 2013 #242
This isn't an auto accident Lurks Often Jun 2013 #243
And your open mind misses the point. LiberalAndProud Jun 2013 #245
"we don't need you to do that" means "get out of the car and see which way Martin had gone"? uppityperson Jun 2013 #175
He got out of the truck BEFORE the dispatcher said that. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #188
"Zimmerman thought the dispatcher meant that he should get out of the car and see which way Martin" uppityperson Jun 2013 #193
That was in testimony yesterday. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #201
"we don't need you to do that" means "get out of the car and see which way Martin had gone"? uppityperson Jun 2013 #204
Take it up with the dispatcher, that was his testimony Lurks Often Jun 2013 #233
Nope. It was your quote. War = Peace. uppityperson Jun 2013 #247
About an armed man fearing for his life. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #146
Please don't use the hands and feet line. Just Saying Jun 2013 #179
My point was that an unarmed man can still be deadly dangerous. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #186
No but most people haven't been trained to do so. Just Saying Jun 2013 #190
Who needed self-defense is for the trial to establish. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #220
Could you give a link to that FBI statistic? rgbecker Jun 2013 #228
It's the same link I posted. Just Saying Jun 2013 #239
Wrong, the burden of proof is on Zimmerman Bjorn Against Jun 2013 #65
"Small laceration" and "minor bleeding" Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #50
Nothing in the report mentions that he wasn't either Lurks Often Jun 2013 #55
If he had been subjected to severe head trauma, don't you think the EMT report would have noted it? Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #57
You don't understand the law Lurks Often Jun 2013 #60
Zimmerman's story is that Trayvon REPEATEDLY hit his head into the sidewalk. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #63
Now you're speculating Lurks Often Jun 2013 #67
I'm not speculating. I'm going off of Zimmerman's own statement. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #70
Your speculating when you said Lurks Often Jun 2013 #72
Detective Sorino (the investigating officer) believed Zimmerman's wounds were not consistent..... Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #75
You presume an ability to predict the future. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #92
The inherent flaw in such thinking: Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #223
The problem of trying to address something serious in a short space. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #225
We agree on one thing Lurks Often Jun 2013 #106
you DO understand Skittles Jun 2013 #83
If I'm to apply some of the arguments I've seen, I could be a crook and hedgehog Jun 2013 #89
Nice to see you're keeping an open mind and looking at all the evidence n/t Lurks Often Jun 2013 #118
oh goodness qazplm Jun 2013 #137
Zimmerman does not have to wait for Lurks Often Jun 2013 #143
not exactly arely staircase Jun 2013 #79
That's a good point. Captain Stern Jun 2013 #90
or I may truly be afraid of all people with red hair and think they are out to kill me arely staircase Jun 2013 #99
This ^^ Just Saying Jun 2013 #97
Agreed and it will be up to attorney's to convince the jury Lurks Often Jun 2013 #120
problem for zimmerman is that his superficial wounds are NOT consistent arely staircase Jun 2013 #125
Exactly TorchTheWitch Jun 2013 #163
you said it better than me arely staircase Jun 2013 #165
these light abrasions on the back of his head look to me TorchTheWitch Jun 2013 #217
Exactly, thank you. uppityperson Jun 2013 #178
You are the one that clearly does not understand the law Bjorn Against Jun 2013 #91
Thank you. He keeps missing that bit. uppityperson Jun 2013 #110
The only thing not in dispute is that Zimmerman killed Martin. Lurks Often Jun 2013 #122
Yes it remains to be seen, but the fact is the burden of proof is on Zimmerman Bjorn Against Jun 2013 #126
Nothing in the report mentions he wasn't stabbed either, or he didn't have appendicitis or he wasn't uppityperson Jun 2013 #177
In todays trial, pictures were shown that showed several lumps on Z's head. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #113
one thing you forgot to mention noiretextatique Jun 2013 #104
And how do you define serious injuries? Lurks Often Jun 2013 #111
If someone had their head hit on pavement repeatedly, there would be more serious injuries and a few uppityperson Jun 2013 #180
Then we disagree Lurks Often Jun 2013 #237
Experience and training. Good lord, that is why EMTs have mandated training and are licensed, to be uppityperson Jun 2013 #249
I think we're going in circles Lurks Often Jun 2013 #254
i don't have a definition, but i am not intereted in spiltting hairs for a murderder noiretextatique Jun 2013 #253
And is there any evidence that would change your mind? n/t Lurks Often Jun 2013 #255
Was he in fear of life when he grabbed a gun and took off after "suspicious" looking unarmed kid. Hoyt Jun 2013 #54
Please limit comments to things that have happened in the trial. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #62
Why? We are supposed to only comment about "things that have happened in the trial"?WTF? uppityperson Jun 2013 #78
self del Skittles Jun 2013 #84
In this thread, I am hoping for intelligent discussion of the events of the trial. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #95
Be honest - you are hoping to protect your love of guns and all the seedy crud Hoyt Jun 2013 #114
Did you know I have three dogs? Nevernose Jun 2013 #86
I prefer cheesecake over regular cake and loath frosting. uppityperson Jun 2013 #87
Sometimes I forget to put the toilet seat down. etherealtruth Jun 2013 #94
Trials don't work that way. Evidence is not submitted in opening statements. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #100
Boy, good thing I'm not on the jury then, huh? Nevernose Jun 2013 #221
Yes. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #222
then he concocted a self-defense scenario noiretextatique Jun 2013 #109
so Trayvon was justified in fighting that gun humping bastard Skittles Jun 2013 #81
"struck on pavement repeadedly" riverwalker Jun 2013 #144
As I have stated a number of times Lurks Often Jun 2013 #147
Which doesn't address what riverwalker is saying. She is talking about the injuries or lack of with uppityperson Jun 2013 #181
Then we disagree Lurks Often Jun 2013 #231
like what? n/t riverwalker Jun 2013 #257
The EMT report describing the wounds Lurks Often Jun 2013 #258
no bruises on martin's hands either arely staircase Jun 2013 #140
An abrasion to a finger on his left hand according to the medical examiner Lurks Often Jun 2013 #145
Yes, it can. I will give you the link. Again. uppityperson Jun 2013 #182
I'll be more clear, I want to hear the testimony of the medical expert Lurks Often Jun 2013 #230
Blood oozes for a period of time after death. Medical fact and I have seen it. Good grief, look uppityperson Jun 2013 #30
I'll defer to the medical experts for the definitive answer Lurks Often Jun 2013 #33
Try this link to ncbi.nlm.nih which says yes, bruises can happen after death uppityperson Jun 2013 #80
no bruises, no broken skin, no trace of blood or zimmerman dna on his hands or under his nails Voice for Peace Jun 2013 #82
= zimmerman is murdering, lying sack of shit eom noiretextatique Jun 2013 #105
Yet some seem so afraid that he's being wrongfully prosecuted. Almost like they identify with him. nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #156
bingo! eom noiretextatique Jun 2013 #248
No DNA on Trayvon's hands according to opening statements csziggy Jun 2013 #183
The lack of DNA btdt64 Jun 2013 #256
I'll be able to watch it briefly, but I have to leave soon. pacalo Jun 2013 #6
Prosecution is being very methodical. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #9
From a WFTV live-stream blogger: One juror is taking extensive notes. pacalo Jun 2013 #12
Does anyone else think mindfulNJ Jun 2013 #15
Those pictures were taken at the police station, not at the scene. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #17
If Trayvon ever hit or scratched Zimmerman Mariana Jun 2013 #18
I would think so too. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #19
I'd like to see more about Z's wounds Just Saying Jun 2013 #28
I remember when I was young and fell off my avebury Jun 2013 #29
My son fell into the stove Just Saying Jun 2013 #37
The paramed cleaned up Z at the site. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #40
No offense but Just Saying Jun 2013 #48
Well, we are talking about what has been shown in the trial. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #59
Okay... Just Saying Jun 2013 #101
I'm sure that will be presented in the trial. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #102
per the paramedics report noiretextatique Jun 2013 #107
But they did clean him up. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #112
there wasn't much to clean noiretextatique Jun 2013 #250
We will see what evidence is introduced. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #259
Zimmerman did not need stitches yardwork Jun 2013 #52
Thanks Just Saying Jun 2013 #58
She is good. Obviously been in lots of trials before. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #16
Does anyone understand the law in FL about the fact chelsea0011 Jun 2013 #34
It is pretty much the same everywhere. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #39
It's a grey area Lurks Often Jun 2013 #42
Only if he regains "innocense"...I know, it's REALLY stupid uponit7771 Jun 2013 #98
I think the "surprise witness" is up now. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #41
Resident of the complex is testifying now. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #45
The defense attorney is starting to get on my nerves. nt avebury Jun 2013 #51
He's trying to make the witness appear confused and mistaken. lpbk2713 Jun 2013 #53
She should focus on what she heard. Not stating which way the sound was moving avebury Jun 2013 #61
Great rebuttal by Prosecutor. He made it clear that avebury Jun 2013 #71
Not reporting the direction of movement does not negate avebury Jun 2013 #64
A couple of issues I am interested in hearing. If Martin was on top of Zimmerman when the shot was Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #128
Yes, pictures were taken at the scene of Z, by the police. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #138
Thanks for the info and explanation. Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #151
For an excellent discussion, see Talkleft.com GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #135
Recently hit my head on a low tree limb HockeyMom Jun 2013 #142
The medics at the scene cleaned him up. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #150
About 6 weeks ago a dog bit my face XemaSab Jun 2013 #212
Legally, you don't have to be seriously wounded before you can defend yourself. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #213
No blood on the ground either? HockeyMom Jun 2013 #218
Or on the grass. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #219
MSNBC showed picture of the body HockeyMom Jun 2013 #251
That's what I'm saying. It just doesn't add up *at all*. nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #160
I watched CNN for a bit just now and... Catherine Vincent Jun 2013 #148
I can never get past the fact DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2013 #149
Z did not ignore instructions from the dispatcher. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #155
It's not been conclusively established that Zimmerman returned to his truck.... Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #164
Zimmerman has stated that he got out of his truck to get the name of the street. avebury Jun 2013 #170
Excellent point. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #185
I don't find that relevant. He was told by the cops not to get out of his car for any reason. Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #189
Did you watch HLN After Dark tonight? avebury Jun 2013 #191
I'm recalling the conversation with the police. That's when Z got out of his car. Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #192
There was a whole discussion about Zimmerman meeting up avebury Jun 2013 #197
No, I'm talking about Z's call WITH the police. Not a dispatcher or someone. It was a male cop Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #200
That was a call to the non-emergency number, to a dispatcher. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #210
Please show that in the transcript of the call. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #206
That's been bothering me since the beginning csziggy Jun 2013 #196
I like that idea davidpdx Jun 2013 #171
If you can pull up the HLN website they have a daily avebury Jun 2013 #172
Thanks for recommending that davidpdx Jun 2013 #184
Found it! Thanks so much! Rhiannon12866 Jun 2013 #187
The site contains an error of fact. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #195
Thanks so much for pointing that out, I've only dealt with rifles. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2013 #198
Vigelante cop wannabees! avebury Jun 2013 #199
If he persisted in doing this, sooner or later something was bound to happen Rhiannon12866 Jun 2013 #203
I totally agree with you. If it had not been Martin, it would avebury Jun 2013 #207
He seemed to be looking for trouble Rhiannon12866 Jun 2013 #208
Yes. He seems to have had a hero complex. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #214
I do. Most people who have CCWs are routinely armed when they leave home. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #202
Since Zimmerman was doing the following, how was he in fear for his life? Rhiannon12866 Jun 2013 #205
If you are getting your head pounded into the concrete... GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #209
I understand and that's exactly my point. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2013 #211
The training was there. He just didn't listen. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #215
And thank you so much for clarifying this, as well. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2013 #216
OP, next time please provide some livestream and/or TV links. Thanks. So---are there any? WinkyDink Jun 2013 #234
Here's an online link Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #236
Appreciated! WinkyDink Jun 2013 #238
Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #244
Link? Wait Wut Jun 2013 #246
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ZIMMERMAN TRIAL: Day 2, T...»Reply #155