Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bannakaffalatta

(94 posts)

1. It's not detailed enough

Reply to Pab Sungenis (Original post)

Tue Jun 25, 2013, 10:41 PM

Jun 2013

It won't stop gerymandering, identification rules, changes of venue, literacy tests (remember those?) disqualifications for traffic offenses by someone with a similar name....

They want their slaves (coloured and gendered) back. At any price.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The only way to fix the Voting Rights Act decision. [View all] Pab Sungenis Jun 2013 OP

It's not detailed enough Bannakaffalatta Jun 2013 #1

No, the Court only found that the 'formula' was unconstitutional, Congress has to come up... PoliticAverse Jun 2013 #2

^^^^____^^^ you read the damn thing too nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #3