Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(51,666 posts)

8. Words are cheap. We need our BUSES back. Routes on maps

Tue Feb 14, 2012, 01:48 PM

Feb 2012

mean nothing if they don't have actual buses on them, on a schedule that makes them even slightly useful to the working public.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama Proposes Doubling Highway Spending on Savings From Troop Withdrawal [View all] Purveyor Feb 2012 OP

Highway Spending equal jobs liberal N proud Feb 2012 #1

Mass trasit is mentioned in the first sentence. tridim Feb 2012 #3

Words are cheap. We need our BUSES back. Routes on maps kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #8

Right, because buses don't use highways or bridges, only cars do. phleshdef Feb 2012 #4

You missed my point. When you get rid of the buses and routes, improving kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #7

I'm sorry, but "don't improve freeways" is not a winning message. phleshdef Feb 2012 #9

Here's the carrot gratuitous Feb 2012 #5

And I can already hear the GOP howling Aerows Feb 2012 #6