Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

still_one

(98,883 posts)

5. It will have to go throught the state courts first, before the Supreme Court. As far as the

Reply to NoPasaran (Reply #4)

Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:44 AM

Jun 2013

decision today, Congress could reinstate it right now if they wanted to. In fact because the house won't do it, the Senate should take it up, and have an up or down vote, then send it to the house, so everyone can see what the republican controlled house will do

Come on Harry, do something right for a change

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Uresti said journal clerk has handwritten note in her notebook that vote started at 12:02 [View all] Tx4obama Jun 2013 OP

Report: Texas senators ordered back to caucus to determine whether contentious abortion bill passed Tx4obama Jun 2013 #1

This is bullshit Politicalboi Jun 2013 #2

Let em. It will go to the courts, and expose their extremism even more still_one Jun 2013 #3

After Tuesday, I'm a little skeptical about the quality of justice being handed down NoPasaran Jun 2013 #4

It will have to go throught the state courts first, before the Supreme Court. As far as the still_one Jun 2013 #5