Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Supreme Court’s decision....is a constitutional train wreck of historic proportions [View all]
from truthdig:
Gutting the Voting Rights Act
Posted on Jun 25, 2013
By Bill Blum
No matter how you parse it, the Supreme Courts decision Tuesday in Shelby County v. Holder, which gutted the Voting Rights Act, is a constitutional train wreck of historic proportions. But unlike most such disasters, this is one we saw coming.
In 2009, in an otherwise obscure case involving a Texas utility district with an elected board of directors (Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder) that was brought to the court by the same group of right-wing activists that engineered the Shelby County case, Chief Justice John Roberts majority opinion questioned the continued validity of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. That section requires states and localities with a legacy of electoral discrimination to obtain preclearance from the Justice Department or the courts before implementing new voting laws and procedures. Currently, nine statesmostly in the Deep South, along with a smattering of counties and cities elsewhereare covered by Section 5.
In Tuesdays fractious 5-4 Shelby County opinion, also authored by Roberts, the court left Section 5 standing but declared Section 4 of the act unconstitutional, which sets forth the formula for determining which jurisdictions across the country are subject to preclearance requirements. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg reasoned in an impassioned dissent joined by the courts liberals, without the Section 4 formula, Section 5, along with all its vital safeguards, is effectively immobilized.
At the heart of the Roberts opinion is the view that racism in America is a thing of the past. When the Voting Rights Act was enacted in 1965, Roberts wrote, the States could be divided into two groups: those with a recent history of voting tests and low voter registration and turnout, and those without those characteristics. Congress based its coverage formula on that distinction. Today the nation is no longer divided along those lines, yet the Voting Rights Act continues to treat it as if it were. .........................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/gutting_the_voting_rights_act_20130625/
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court’s decision....is a constitutional train wreck of historic proportions [View all]
marmar
Jun 2013
OP
And still some DUers continue to proclaim that "majorities in congress don't matter."
great white snark
Jun 2013
#3
There is a slight chance to make lemonade here. Actual disenfranchisement has grown.
kickysnana
Jun 2013
#9
Here's the solution, subject ALL to the old rules of the VRA that were struck down.
roamer65
Jun 2013
#12