Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Warpy

(114,645 posts)

2. Scalia has always wanted to replace the constitution

Reply to DainBramaged (Original post)

Wed Jun 26, 2013, 11:04 AM

Jun 2013

with his own ridiculously biased and inaccurate reading of the bible. He simply can't comprehend a nation of laws that doesn't answer to a pope or a book written by Bronze Age nomads.

He is unfit. I wish there was a way to remove him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"the same diseased root" [View all] DainBramaged Jun 2013 OP

Amazing how this doesn't apply to yesterdays ruling. justiceischeap Jun 2013 #1

Exactly. They all just twist their logic to fit their dogma. BlueStreak Jun 2013 #3

Scalia has always wanted to replace the constitution Warpy Jun 2013 #2

When they were elected/selected they put their hand on a Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution DainBramaged Jun 2013 #7

Well, that's what confused them, then. Warpy Jun 2013 #9

Now ask yourself what that means... last1standing Jun 2013 #4

Here's your diseased root fuck face. Bush v Gore Autumn Jun 2013 #5

Wouldn't that apply to VRA as well??? sinkingfeeling Jun 2013 #6

i hope he realizes he just gave himself a nickname for fucking ever! arely staircase Jun 2013 #8

Scalia boston bean Jun 2013 #10