Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
22. The fact is Nader cost Gore votes. Yes Nader had the right to run and I will defend that, but...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:30 PM
Jun 2013

... he knew his voters who would have voted if he was not on the ballot would have gone to Gore. NH and FL could very well have gone to Gore and the campaign would have been different if Nader was not in the race. Gore had to heavily defend NM, WI, OR, WA, and MN because Nader made those states closer than they would have been without Nader on the ballot. Gore could have spent more time in other states and won if Nader was not in the race.

The republicans are responsible for their own actions. Nader Chose to run hard in 2000 and he had to have known that he would cost Gore votes. He has to live with that and if he can so be it. He had the right to run but he knew he could not win. He made an impact like he want to but it was not the impact many of his supporters wanted.

I personally hold Nader responsible for Bush. Yes Gore ran a bad campaign and yes the GOP cheated but if Nader was not on the ballot the GOP efforts to cheat would not have likely worked IMO. You have a different opinion and I respect it but I disagree.

I'm just going to sit here Autumn Jun 2013 #1
me too noiretextatique Jun 2013 #3
BTW...Nadir is a republican. n/t BlueToTheBone Jun 2013 #2
i knew it! noiretextatique Jun 2013 #4
oh c'mon nader haters noiretextatique Jun 2013 #5
they'd rather ignore al gore's crummy campaign or the fact he actually won and gave up nt msongs Jun 2013 #6
Well, his other choice was taking up arms nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #7
yep...and just look at how great that turned out noiretextatique Jun 2013 #8
You make decisions on what you know at the momemt nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #9
me too...it is inevitable noiretextatique Jun 2013 #20
Bush and Nader voters have the same blame. gulliver Jun 2013 #10
STOP. THIS. NOW. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #13
Rec AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #31
i hold bush voters accountable too noiretextatique Jun 2013 #15
Or the so-called ray gun democrats still_one Jun 2013 #26
F**k them both (see how easy that was). JoePhilly Jun 2013 #11
sure is easy noiretextatique Jun 2013 #17
Thank You. Jennicut Jun 2013 #28
I am going to take up the cause of George HW Bush: If it weren't for Ross Perot and his 19% of the byeya Jun 2013 #12
LOL noiretextatique Jun 2013 #18
Actually, 3rd parties are bad all the time. great white snark Jun 2013 #25
actully there is literally no evidence that Perot cost Bush any state outside of NJ dsc Jun 2013 #32
what's with all the nader posts all of a sudden? arely staircase Jun 2013 #14
nope...crazy scotus decisions noiretextatique Jun 2013 #16
Fuck Nader... SidDithers Jun 2013 #19
cogent, well-thought out argument noiretextatique Jun 2013 #21
It's what the OP deserved...nt SidDithers Jun 2013 #24
The fact is Nader cost Gore votes. Yes Nader had the right to run and I will defend that, but... hrmjustin Jun 2013 #22
maybe because you expect an enemy to work for your defeat hfojvt Jun 2013 #23
"How about we try winning back the House instead of arguing about Nader or promoting 3rd parties" great white snark Jun 2013 #27
two things are 100% true with a third add on bonus graham4anything Jun 2013 #29
Elana Kagan is one of the best Obama nominations - IF YOU FAVOR ELIMINATING THE MIRANDA RULE AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #33
Two minutes of hate are predictable nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #30
Well said. Thanks for saying it so clearly and forcefully. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #34
Nader enables repukes. Zoeisright Jun 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hey GOP, the party of per...»Reply #22