Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(93,771 posts)
4. true. There has to be an element of leadership to both propel and perpetuate these types of changes
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:32 PM
Jun 2013

. . . one of the most important things that I take from the history of Abraham Lincoln's 'emancipation' efforts for blacks in America is the reality of his own ambivalence toward black independence and even their ability to coexist with whites in this country. In a debate with Stephen Douglas in 1858, Lincoln was clear about his own antipathy toward giving blacks rights regularly afforded to the white majority:

Lincoln:

“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.”


His subsequent embrace of the 13th Amendment reflects the way Americans, as a whole, were compelled to relinquish their prejudices and accept the emergence of rights for blacks in the newly established United States. Out of both a material need and an epiphany about a 'more perfect Union,' Lincoln brought America to realize their own benefit in granting measures of inclusiveness and opportunity to an enslaved and oppressed class of inhabitants.


I remember a story told of the integration of a particular school in the South after 'Brown' and the federal govt. intervention where ALL of the white students were pulled out of classes by their parents when a handful of black youth were admitted. Those black youth attended classes in a virtually empty school that year. The next year, however, the majority of the white students had been allowed to return - and time and history marched on.

It really is remarkable how our insistence on progressive change has the potential to move mountains of resistance, in the end. History tells us this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Defense Chief Hagel says ...»Reply #4