Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
11. "They spoke anonymously as a condition of describing their surveillance of the groups."
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 10:47 PM
Jun 2013

Right, because this information would only help al Queda if there was a name attached to it. Anonymous makes it okay.

So in order to describe the harm Snowden has done, we tell al Queda info about what our sense of their current communication methods is?

Silliness.

Also, note that a congressperson disclosed presumably classified intelligence (anonymously) for this article about al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula's techniques.

I wonder how upset that congressperson is about Snowden, while leaking sensitive intel about al-Qaida surveillance to the press.

That's what kills me... Peter King (for instance) is a one man espionage crew. He can't open his mouth without blabbing some shit. And he is probably among the most upset about leakers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The fact the NSA intercepts int'l calls has been known for 40 years. The leak doesn't effect real leveymg Jun 2013 #1
The next phase of damage control has begun. Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #2
What surprises me is that there really is NO proof that NSA domestic spying has stopped any real leveymg Jun 2013 #4
One might expect a secretive agency to be..........well, secretive Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #8
Well, therein lies a problem - to which there are solutions The Straight Story Jun 2013 #9
Looking for the like button! nt IdaBriggs Jun 2013 #10
It's past time for the intelligence services to stop pretending they are not accountable and don't leveymg Jun 2013 #15
Then maybe they shouldn't have been spying on all of us necessitating these exposals. dkf Jun 2013 #3
+Infinity! You have nailed it! - nt HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #7
They contradict themselves in then story nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #5
If anyone believes this load of shit, I've got a bridge in New York for sale - nt HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #6
No, now...wait... Kurovski Jun 2013 #12
"They spoke anonymously as a condition of describing their surveillance of the groups." cthulu2016 Jun 2013 #11
Yup nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #13
Sure it is. Autumn Jun 2013 #14
"The officials spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to speak..." BlueCheese Jun 2013 #16
How did they get this information without spying on the American people? kentuck Jun 2013 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Al-Qaida said to be chang...»Reply #11