Trayon Martin yelling for help, that is another clincher

[Just Saying]

87. Lets see...

"The fact that Trayvon had none of Zimmerman's DNA on his hands is evidence
.....NO...that's a LACK of evidence! "

And goes against Z's story that Trayvon puts his hands over his bleeding nose and mouth.

"the fact that Zimmerman said on the police call that he was following Trayvon is evidence
......and if a stranger were wandering through my private property, in the dark, essentially trespassing, I would follow them too! "

Total bullshit. Trayvon was not trespassing in any way, shape or form. It was not Zimmerman's property and Trayvon was staying with a resident in the complex. He had every legal right to walk where he was.

"the fact that Zimmerman's wounds were not consistent with the attack he described is evidence
.......perhaps your opinion "

Since Z likely won't testify, it's very important that evidence tell his version of events.

"the fact that the neighbor says she heard Trayvon screaming is evidence
.............she testified she heard screaming...in her opinion a 'younger voice'...but certainly no proof it was TM's voice "

Witnesses don't have to have proof. They just have to be credible and she was very credible. Plus her 911 call gives more weight to her testimony.

"the fact that George Zimmerman committed perjury in relation to the murder is evidence
.....so if Z changes his story, it's perjury (I thought you could only commit perjury in relation to direct testimony in a court proceeding), but if a witness changes their story (under direct testimony) it remains credible? "

Not purjury if he wasn't under oath but goes to his credibility if the jury is made aware of it.