Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
80. Here's PRISM
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 05:55 PM
Jun 2013

Firstly, the black and white way this thing is debated is seriously aggravating. On balance, whether what Snowden did was more good than evil is something we'll have to wait a while to see. He did unveil the fact that the NSA has continued to spy on domestic activities with warrants that are a joke. But the rest of what he did was not only wrong, it endangers future whistleblowers who want to reveal stuff like this, by making it easy to tag them as traitors.
Because the rest of what he did is traitorous.

Now, on to PRISM.

It took me, I am not lying, 15 seconds to find this using Google.

Computer Evidence Specialists (CES) Launches PRISM, a Social Media Investigative and Research Tool

ST. AUGUSTINE, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Computer Evidence Specialists (CES), a firm specializing in investigations, intelligence and analytics, has launched PRISM, a browser-based social media aggregation tool designed to allow users to search, identify, monitor and archive information publicly available on the most popular social media sites. PRISM was created by a team comprised of former FBI executives, lawyers, and investigative analysts. With PRISM, users can use a single tool to search across multiple social media sites, blogs, and news sites to capture information. PRISM provides users with the ability to make sense of the vast amount of information available on social media.
With the rise of social media, more and more individuals and organizations are posting publicly available content. Within that content lies pertinent information which is useful to organizations. Before PRISM, users had to manually comb through multiple social media sites to try and synthesize the available data for information relevant to their needs. PRISM offers a single place to pull together all available data, filter out the noise, and make sense of the avalanche of information out there. To aid users, PRISM features the ability to map posts, compare digital footprints, monitor profiles, and to identify and monitor organizations. Users can export all data, including meta-data, for use with knowledge visualization analytical tools. PRISM is built upon an extremely versatile platform which can be accessed from anywhere with an Internet connection. PRISM allows any organization to efficiently manage the collection and analysis of publicly available information on persons, organizations and events.

About CES
CES is a professional firm, founded by Carl Florez, a former FBI executive, to provide investigative, intelligence, and analytical services to government agencies, private companies, and law firms. CES has consistently provided new and innovative tools and techniques to meet the needs of their clients.


So much for that big revelation. It would have taken Greenwald literally seconds to figure out someone was blowing smoke up his rear end.

Now, the one thing he did right was to launch this whole debate about the NSA collecting our metadata. That is in fact dangerous.
But he went well beyond that. He is offering to give up every CIA agent around the world, and what their mission is. That info may (no way of knowing, and no one is going to volunteer that this has happened) already be in the hands of both the Chinese and the Russians.
Why would he do this?
No reason related to these NSA revelations re domestic surveillance.
But what about the rest of the world, someone says plaintively?
The NSA, or whomever from the USG, hacking into systems around the world is just a cyber version of spying. That's all. The rest of the world should expect that if this method is available for spying, it will be used. You can be sure our Defense Dept assumes this and acts accordingly.
Snowden revealing NSA domestic surveillance with ridiculously written warrants makes him a whistleblower.
Snowden revealing our spying, down to where agents are and what their missions are, makes him a traitor, and dangerous to every whistleblower who comes after him.

Greenwald believing what Snowden told him re PRISM makes him a sucker, by the way. Just for the record.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

their watchword is "legal". well lotsa stuff in the 1930's was "legal" too nt msongs Jun 2013 #1
Yeah, like when Greenwald 'reported' the NSA was stealing info directly from private servers railsback Jun 2013 #2
Can you prove that the NSA/FBI/DOJ/Whoever is not doing it? Savannahmann Jun 2013 #5
Thanks, Savannahmann ReRe Jun 2013 #7
Do you realize how paranoid that sounds? randome Jun 2013 #11
Yes, I live in a rural area, Savannahmann Jun 2013 #15
I don't think anything would satisfy you unless you were personally directing the NSA. randome Jun 2013 #24
So despite a long and documented history of the Government telling lies Savannahmann Jun 2013 #29
I usually don't second-guess the FBI, CIA, local police, Interpol, MI5, etc... randome Jun 2013 #32
And if President Obama wasn't told the truth? Savannahmann Jun 2013 #49
Read this and see if you feel the same way: ReRe Jun 2013 #92
Saying you can't trust any government agency is standard libertarian propaganda arely staircase Jun 2013 #50
It's also a standard leftist position... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #62
leftists believe in using the government to solve problems arely staircase Jun 2013 #63
"Governments lie"... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #68
well, all people lie arely staircase Jun 2013 #85
Was it the left wing that gave us the Patriot Act & Homeland Security? think Jun 2013 #79
Can you prove they were? railsback Jun 2013 #25
By circumstantial evidence sure. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #33
Well, according the Army's FM3-55 handbook, which is public railsback Jun 2013 #35
So again, you dismiss the arguments Savannahmann Jun 2013 #46
One says PRISM is a super secret spy program no one knew of railsback Jun 2013 #51
But, but,....STOP ATTACKING MESSENGER! Galraedia Jun 2013 #83
can you prove I'm not levitating right now? arely staircase Jun 2013 #41
Ha! If you were levitating, you would not be typing on a keyboard! randome Jun 2013 #44
as a matter of fact it does arely staircase Jun 2013 #47
I can assume that you're not railsback Jun 2013 #52
I'm a levitating sycophant arely staircase Jun 2013 #53
Well, who should we believe, the Corporations who have been caught lying so many times before sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #21
Oh, so now it comes down to nothing more than 'belief' railsback Jun 2013 #27
Apparently for you it does. Do you have some proof of anything you 'believe' or is it just sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #55
The accusers need to prove their case railsback Jun 2013 #56
I think you meant to say... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #60
No, Greenwald claimed they had direct access to the servers railsback Jun 2013 #61
Here is a link to the article: ljm2002 Jun 2013 #64
Yes, fully aware of the article railsback Jun 2013 #67
From the article: ljm2002 Jun 2013 #69
Lies? railsback Jun 2013 #73
The article reports what the NSA slides claim... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #76
YOU ARE ASSUMING railsback Jun 2013 #81
And when people ask legitimate questions Summer Hathaway Jun 2013 #3
If the point of contention is the message, it's still and attack on the messenger. TheMadMonk Jun 2013 #4
The messenger decides the content of his message. jeff47 Jun 2013 #14
When the messenger provides documentation the messenger no longer matters. And ONLY those sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #22
Again, the messenger decides what to leak. jeff47 Jun 2013 #86
The IRS scandal is a scandal, inside of a scandal, inside of a scandal ReRe Jun 2013 #93
Issa's just a convenient, 1-2 sentence example. jeff47 Jun 2013 #94
Si, Senor/Senorita. n/t ReRe Jun 2013 #95
When the messenger is blabbing about spying the US is doing on Russia and China, pnwmom Jun 2013 #6
old news frylock Jun 2013 #17
And an ongoing problem. Is he still in Russia or has he moved on? n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #20
idk. if you have his number i'll call and ask. frylock Jun 2013 #23
Apparently he's still there, lugging around his computers, talking to . . . whoever. pnwmom Jun 2013 #26
well, tomorrow's another day.. frylock Jun 2013 #31
What does it matter, everyone knew that already, he didn't release anything sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #34
Yes, he has. For instance, as a part of the power point, pnwmom Jun 2013 #45
So he DID release 'new' information? We were being told here that it was all 'old news'. I get sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #59
Plame's statement concerned internal surveillance only, but the issue I'm talking about here pnwmom Jun 2013 #70
Got a link to that? And I was just told again in another thread that is 'all old news'. People need sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #71
I know you're keeping up with this. You can find it yourself if you care. n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #72
and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law arely staircase Jun 2013 #43
If Fox News says it is Thursday then some would argue that today can't possibly be Thursday. KurtNYC Jun 2013 #8
No truer words, TMM ReRe Jun 2013 #9
It's an old sentiment, but AFAIK the phrasing is mine. /nt TheMadMonk Jun 2013 #87
Does that include dismissing people as administration shills? Recursion Jun 2013 #10
When the messenger's credibility is suspect Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #12
Especially when we have the documents themselves nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #16
Lol, they always forget about the documents. I guess they haven't bothered to research exactly sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #36
The "messenger" matters. Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #39
The Verizon production order speaks for itself nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #42
And if the messenger is telling lies? baldguy Jun 2013 #13
extremists? frylock Jun 2013 #18
If the messenger producers documents, which is the case here, it doesn't matter of the sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #37
In the case here, Snowdens documents say one thing and his allegations say another. baldguy Jun 2013 #54
Try to focus. It doesn't matter what HE says, or you believe, or anything else. It matters only what sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #57
So, you're attacking the messenger if the messenger also engages geek tragedy Jun 2013 #19
Not at all, I do my bloody damndedest to debate the subject matter... TheMadMonk Jun 2013 #88
BS BOTH can be discussed treestar Jun 2013 #28
The 'victim' is not the OP. He can correct me if I am wrong, but I believe he is talking about the sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #38
Why is the discussing of Eddie's faults a "smear campaign?" treestar Jun 2013 #48
Who is 'Eddie'? But let's talk about that 'data base' which we now have more information about sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #58
what about people who declare ther messenger a "hero"? arely staircase Jun 2013 #30
Please provide a list of who MAY and who MAY NOT be questioned. So we know. n/t UTUSN Jun 2013 #40
THERE IS NO FUCKING WHO! There is only that which needs to be said. /nt TheMadMonk Jun 2013 #89
Yeah, if it conforms to our prejudices. You know, like what Faux tells their audience, or what UTUSN Jun 2013 #90
I was pretty sure the NSA was collecting all our phone records... BlueCheese Jun 2013 #65
Character assassination is a huge red flag. The people that participate in it are fucking scum. backscatter712 Jun 2013 #66
It's not character assasination - it's character DESCRIPTION. baldguy Jun 2013 #75
Yes, but if the accurate picture is of less than no consequence sibelian Jun 2013 #77
. baldguy Jun 2013 #78
Its just promoting bobduca Jun 2013 #91
Happens all the time here DainBramaged Jun 2013 #74
Here's PRISM Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #80
A few things. If he has 'every agent and their missions' in his hands, the real traitor is he Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #97
Well, lets look at the actual story, shall we? Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #98
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo Jun 2013 #82
What proof has Snowden offered to support his claim that from he could wiretap anyone... Galraedia Jun 2013 #84
So your response is to attack the messenger. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #96
K+R sibelian Jun 2013 #99
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People who would attack t...»Reply #80