Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(80,011 posts)
3. Peace at the barrel of a gun......
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 10:20 PM
Feb 2012

I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle-man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.

During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.


-- Gen. Smedley Butler


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I like the idea for discussion-- and I generally disagree with your premise... mike_c Feb 2012 #1
I will be happy to exchange ideas whenever you are back NT BrentWil Feb 2012 #2
Peace at the barrel of a gun...... marmar Feb 2012 #3
I would agree to somewhat.. BrentWil Feb 2012 #4
Two states that are "capitalist" are less likely to fight... like Germany and the UK in 1914? LooseWilly Feb 2012 #30
"Auferre trucidare rapere falsis nominis imperium, atque ubi solitudinem faciunt pacem appellant" alcibiades_mystery Feb 2012 #5
We have made some huge foreign policy mistakes... but what have we turned into a desert? BrentWil Feb 2012 #6
Living standards in Iraq are worse than before the war Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2012 #7
Huge steps forward in some ways, yes. white_wolf Feb 2012 #11
Capitalism makes a desert alcibiades_mystery Feb 2012 #15
Lemme see, according to Congressman Filner nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #27
Don't forget the depleted uranium munitions we dropped all over Serbia during the Kosovo War. nt Selatius Feb 2012 #32
Two World Wars disagree with your premise. white_wolf Feb 2012 #8
I think the author wouldn't argue that it makes more impossible, just less likely NT BrentWil Feb 2012 #12
LOL. Capitalism = Endless War. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #9
ignoring WWI, WWII, etc. just discard all the inconvenient conflicts. Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #10
The general argument is that war is less likely, not impossible NT BrentWil Feb 2012 #13
Less likely than what? Than feudalism? alcibiades_mystery Feb 2012 #16
Well, it looks at the years between 1950-92. BrentWil Feb 2012 #19
The capitalist powers were less likely to go to war, because they were united against a common foe white_wolf Feb 2012 #20
But does it fall apart after 92? I mean, off hand, I can't think of many examples of two countries BrentWil Feb 2012 #22
Given your timeframe, it's just as legitimate alcibiades_mystery Feb 2012 #21
There were no huge wars because both sides had nuclear weapons, not necessarily due to trade. Selatius Feb 2012 #31
There were plenty of wars between '50-'92... but the "variables" indicate previous surrender... LooseWilly Feb 2012 #33
This is what he uses and the rational BrentWil Feb 2012 #54
cherry pick much? Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #34
He just uses the data set that most political scientist use: BrentWil Feb 2012 #56
the general argument was made 20 years ago and was self-serving stupid then Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #18
History says otherwise MadHound Feb 2012 #14
When the machines for war are a commodity in a capitalist society, DJ13 Feb 2012 #17
Mmmmmm.......how's that been workin' for ya so far? kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #23
obvious that gov must be an adversary of criminal capitalism tiny elvis Feb 2012 #24
imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism. provis99 Feb 2012 #25
I do not agree. PowerToThePeople Feb 2012 #26
Of course there is another problem with this argument nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #28
Correlation is not causation. JDPriestly Feb 2012 #29
If capitalism is libtodeath Feb 2012 #35
I think you are dead wrong. GeorgeGist Feb 2012 #36
.. mdmc Feb 2012 #37
If this assertion is true, then clearly the world is not now tledford Feb 2012 #38
Actually conflict is generally trending downwards... NT BrentWil Feb 2012 #40
Totally! If it weren't for capitalism raouldukelives Feb 2012 #39
Huh? mmonk Feb 2012 #41
Of course you have to willfully ignore the overwhelming abundance of evidence to the contrary. Edweird Feb 2012 #42
lol... yeah, convincing fascisthunter Feb 2012 #43
Now let's try some facts: TBF Feb 2012 #44
The argument is that two states with an open market are less likely to fight a war... BrentWil Feb 2012 #45
We have been at war through our entire existence, which means the study is whack. nt TBF Feb 2012 #48
"open markets" often being a tidy neoliberal euphemism.. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #49
I think it just means generally free economic interactions between states. BrentWil Feb 2012 #53
The US ceased being Capitalist decades ago Creideiki Feb 2012 #46
How are we not capitalist? white_wolf Feb 2012 #47
Capitalists wage war on countries all the time lunatica Feb 2012 #50
I would disagree... BrentWil Feb 2012 #52
Trade, and open borders have always helped to lead to peace. RB TexLa Feb 2012 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author whatchamacallit Feb 2012 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Capitalist Peace: Why...»Reply #3