Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Capitalist Peace: Why a Capitalist World Means a World At Peace [View all]marmar
(80,011 posts)3. Peace at the barrel of a gun......
I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle-man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
-- Gen. Smedley Butler
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Two states that are "capitalist" are less likely to fight... like Germany and the UK in 1914?
LooseWilly
Feb 2012
#30
"Auferre trucidare rapere falsis nominis imperium, atque ubi solitudinem faciunt pacem appellant"
alcibiades_mystery
Feb 2012
#5
We have made some huge foreign policy mistakes... but what have we turned into a desert?
BrentWil
Feb 2012
#6
Don't forget the depleted uranium munitions we dropped all over Serbia during the Kosovo War. nt
Selatius
Feb 2012
#32
I think the author wouldn't argue that it makes more impossible, just less likely NT
BrentWil
Feb 2012
#12
The capitalist powers were less likely to go to war, because they were united against a common foe
white_wolf
Feb 2012
#20
But does it fall apart after 92? I mean, off hand, I can't think of many examples of two countries
BrentWil
Feb 2012
#22
There were no huge wars because both sides had nuclear weapons, not necessarily due to trade.
Selatius
Feb 2012
#31
There were plenty of wars between '50-'92... but the "variables" indicate previous surrender...
LooseWilly
Feb 2012
#33
the general argument was made 20 years ago and was self-serving stupid then
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2012
#18
Of course you have to willfully ignore the overwhelming abundance of evidence to the contrary.
Edweird
Feb 2012
#42
The argument is that two states with an open market are less likely to fight a war...
BrentWil
Feb 2012
#45