Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

adric mutelovic

(208 posts)

10. I didn't say it was the only thing that will decide the case

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:57 PM

Jun 2013

But since a combination of issues will come together to decide the case, we have to tackled them one by one, and who was on top (which is one key issue) is not really getting rid of "reasonable doubt" (witnesses contradicting each other).

Today's most important testimony as of the time of my post was about who was on top, and I commented about it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

witness says trayvon was on top, another one says he was at the bottom [View all] adric mutelovic Jun 2013 OP

If you plan on deciding case based upon that, as opposed to considering the bigot grabbing his gun Hoyt Jun 2013 #1

LOL, I just got lectured about using the alsame Jun 2013 #9

I love how the gun nuts discredit the term "stalking" if it doesn't fit the legal csziggy Jun 2013 #15

Exactly. nt alsame Jun 2013 #17

I didn't say it was the only thing that will decide the case adric mutelovic Jun 2013 #10

Maybe....bear with me....they rolled over at some point. Maybe? And... uppityperson Jun 2013 #2

MMA style guy has recanted.. frylock Jun 2013 #12

Witness did NOT recant ksoze Jun 2013 #18

I thought he said he saw "downward motion"? uppityperson Jun 2013 #22

Shouldn't even be based on that Xyzse Jun 2013 #3

This isn't a stand your ground case, it's self defense. dkf Jun 2013 #7

Ah... Xyzse Jun 2013 #11

Nooo, premium Jun 2013 #19

Yeah, you're right Xyzse Jun 2013 #20

The witnesses that have Zimmerman on top... Pelican Jun 2013 #4

The jury will have to weigh both pieces of testimony, nyquil_man Jun 2013 #5

Where is the forensic evidence? dkf Jun 2013 #6

Yes HockeyMom Jun 2013 #8

The thing that sticks with me is that the screaming stopped right after the gun shot. MoonRiver Jun 2013 #13

That makes no sense - of course it did ksoze Jun 2013 #14

What a wonderful example of ..... oldhippie Jun 2013 #21

I hope the jury doesn't use your logic Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #23

Here's the thing though premium Jun 2013 #16

Has nothing to do with reasonable doubt. Just conflicting testimony. sinkingfeeling Jun 2013 #24