Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(7,784 posts)

17. Exactly. nt

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:54 PM

Jun 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

witness says trayvon was on top, another one says he was at the bottom [View all] adric mutelovic Jun 2013 OP

LOL, I just got lectured about using the alsame Jun 2013 #9

Exactly. nt alsame Jun 2013 #17

I didn't say it was the only thing that will decide the case adric mutelovic Jun 2013 #10

Maybe....bear with me....they rolled over at some point. Maybe? And... uppityperson Jun 2013 #2

MMA style guy has recanted.. frylock Jun 2013 #12

Witness did NOT recant ksoze Jun 2013 #18

I thought he said he saw "downward motion"? uppityperson Jun 2013 #22

Shouldn't even be based on that Xyzse Jun 2013 #3

This isn't a stand your ground case, it's self defense. dkf Jun 2013 #7

Ah... Xyzse Jun 2013 #11

Nooo, premium Jun 2013 #19

Yeah, you're right Xyzse Jun 2013 #20

The witnesses that have Zimmerman on top... Pelican Jun 2013 #4

The jury will have to weigh both pieces of testimony, nyquil_man Jun 2013 #5

Where is the forensic evidence? dkf Jun 2013 #6

Yes HockeyMom Jun 2013 #8

That makes no sense - of course it did ksoze Jun 2013 #14

What a wonderful example of ..... oldhippie Jun 2013 #21

I hope the jury doesn't use your logic Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #23

Here's the thing though premium Jun 2013 #16

Has nothing to do with reasonable doubt. Just conflicting testimony. sinkingfeeling Jun 2013 #24