Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Robert Scheer: U.S. Elections Are for Suckers [View all]

Elections Are for Suckers
By Robert Scheer
Editor in Chief
February 9, 2012
Lets just dip our fingers in purple ink and pose for photos now that voting has the same significance for us as it had for those Iraqis who got conned into thinking they were participating in some grand democratic experiment.
Our own elections, the ones our government has modeled for the world, are a hoax. What other word should we use to describe this years presidential election, whose outcome will turn on which partys super PACs gets the most generous bribes from billionaires? The Republicans, enabled by decisions of a Supreme Court they still control, were the first out of the gate and are far more culpable in destroying our system of popular governance. But the Democrats, no less committed to winning at any cost to political principle, have now jumped in.
The generally reserved New York Times editorial page responded to the Obama campaigns decision to seek super PAC funding with a scathing editorial headlined Another Campaign for Sale. The Times reminded that Barack Obama, in his State of the Union speech two years ago, called out the Supreme Court justices sitting before him over their decision to free special interests from campaign spending limits. I dont think American elections should be bankrolled by Americas most powerful interests, Obama said then. They should be decided by the American people. But sadly, as the Times editorial noted this week, On Monday, the President abandoned that fundamental principle and gave in to the culture of the Citizens United decision that he once denounced as a threat to our democracy.
Read the full article at:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/elections_are_for_suckers_20120209/
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Poisoning the well" because of a truth or a lie is still "Poisoning the well" ain't it.
L0oniX
Feb 2012
#56
Unrec. Another post in your unrelenting campaign to encourage people not to vote for Obama?
FSogol
Feb 2012
#5
You're now on ignore for your unrelenting campaign of personal attacks on DU'ers you disagree with.
Better Believe It
Feb 2012
#8
Maybe you are part of the problem with DU in that you aren't interested in discussing...
L0oniX
Feb 2012
#41
Absolutely agree, newspeak. SCOTUS also has done a number on progress and people for a long time.
Octafish
Feb 2012
#31
Posting a rant from a Paulista telling us both political parties are the same?
Ikonoklast
Feb 2012
#13
At this point in time, the only "suckers" will be the people who DON'T vote. nt
nanabugg
Feb 2012
#15
Well, the fact is your single vote or mine will not determine who is elected President.
Better Believe It
Feb 2012
#27
My one vote might be counted (depends upon the machine) but it won't elect a President.
Better Believe It
Feb 2012
#40
I Love How People are Acussing you of Trying Alter this upcoming Election
fascisthunter
Feb 2012
#58