Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Robert Scheer: U.S. Elections Are for Suckers [View all]SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)3. Guess I'm a sucker then
Interesting for someone who is railing against the use of Super Pacs permitted by the Supreme Court decision, only seems to be railing at the Democrats. At least he acknowledges that the debacle was made possible by a Republican controlled Supreme Court.
Also interesting coming from someone who supported Rand Paul's 2010 bid for Congress.
Support of Republican Candidate for Kentucky Senate
In the October 1, 2010, episode of the radio show "Left, Right and Center", Scheer, a self-described Liberal, expressed support for Rand Paul, son of former Libertarian presidential candidate Ron Paul, in his bid for the 2011-2016 Kentucky Senate seat
In the October 1, 2010, episode of the radio show "Left, Right and Center", Scheer, a self-described Liberal, expressed support for Rand Paul, son of former Libertarian presidential candidate Ron Paul, in his bid for the 2011-2016 Kentucky Senate seat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Scheer
Who's afraid of Rand Paul? by Robert Scheer
Rand Paul: All of Us Are Corporations
PAUL: Corporations are collections of people. I think were all corporations. To say were going to punish corporations like theyre someone else. All of us are corporations.
How Does Robert Scheer Feel Now?
I can understand the confusion for some Americans who do not understand what Baby Paul's beliefs really stand for. The media does a terrible job when it comes to explaining the positions our politicians take. And they are even worse when someone like Poppa Paul takes the podium because they either don't spend the time researching a fringe type figure, are afraid to expose their views publicly, or feel it's not worth the effort to do so.
...
I understand his frustration absolutely at what has happened since the 2008 election, but Scheer is either too angry to think straight or he's being played for a sucker.
...
I understand his frustration absolutely at what has happened since the 2008 election, but Scheer is either too angry to think straight or he's being played for a sucker.
http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/how-does-robert-sheer-feel-now
Oh and I find it really disturbing that he blames the financial meltdown on Clinton:
The Democrats Who Unleashed Wall Street and Got Away With It
That Lawrence Summers, a president emeritus of Harvard, is a consummate distorter of fact and logic is not a revelation. That he and Bill Clinton, the president he served as treasury secretary, can still get away with disclaiming responsibility for our financial meltdown is an insult to reason.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-scheer/the-democrats-who-unleash_b_1249110.html
Once again he reserves his ire for a Democrat and not GW...wow
Does Citizens United need to go in the dust bin? Absolutely, it should never have happened. Unfortunately thanks to the Supreme Court which already leans Right, it is now law. The Democrats while not happy with that law, are playing by the rules that are now set in place. Do I like the fact that Obama is playing by the rules, in this case? NO, but I realize it is necessary. He needs to win re-election...if for no other reason than to prevent a true takeover of the Supreme Court that will last decades to come, and you will get even more disastrous decisions like Citizens United. It's already 5-4. A few of the Justices will be retiring soon, or worse die while on the bench. They are not spring chickens.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Poisoning the well" because of a truth or a lie is still "Poisoning the well" ain't it.
L0oniX
Feb 2012
#56
Unrec. Another post in your unrelenting campaign to encourage people not to vote for Obama?
FSogol
Feb 2012
#5
You're now on ignore for your unrelenting campaign of personal attacks on DU'ers you disagree with.
Better Believe It
Feb 2012
#8
Maybe you are part of the problem with DU in that you aren't interested in discussing...
L0oniX
Feb 2012
#41
Absolutely agree, newspeak. SCOTUS also has done a number on progress and people for a long time.
Octafish
Feb 2012
#31
Posting a rant from a Paulista telling us both political parties are the same?
Ikonoklast
Feb 2012
#13
At this point in time, the only "suckers" will be the people who DON'T vote. nt
nanabugg
Feb 2012
#15
Well, the fact is your single vote or mine will not determine who is elected President.
Better Believe It
Feb 2012
#27
My one vote might be counted (depends upon the machine) but it won't elect a President.
Better Believe It
Feb 2012
#40
I Love How People are Acussing you of Trying Alter this upcoming Election
fascisthunter
Feb 2012
#58