Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
56. The witness has admitted he doesn't know what he saw
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:02 PM
Jun 2013

So keep telling your self what ever it is that you need to- to justify this boy's murder in your own mind.

There's not too many people buying what you're trying to sell here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think TM didn't get a chance to even hit GZ Politicalboi Jun 2013 #1
Wrong ksoze Jun 2013 #2
Other witnesses put GZ on top Beaverhausen Jun 2013 #8
Now now.. Witness just claimed that he saw multiple MMA style punches... Pelican Jun 2013 #9
MMA style guy recanted months ago.. frylock Jun 2013 #15
Got it.. repeated downward movement with his arm towards the guy's head... Pelican Jun 2013 #18
you've made your decision frylock Jun 2013 #20
I know it seems like that... Pelican Jun 2013 #21
Those sorts of downward arm movements would also be consistent Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #33
Agreed. Another way of saying it might be Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #54
witness has recanted. saw NO blows being thrown.. frylock Jun 2013 #13
Same witness recanted and had multiple versions of his testimoney. Zimmerman trained for MMA fights uponit7771 Jun 2013 #26
The witness has admitted he doesn't know what he saw notadmblnd Jun 2013 #56
This witness is a big help to the defense. Vattel Jun 2013 #69
No,he wasn't on top sreaming for help notadmblnd Jun 2013 #74
The witness in question says that someone was yelling for help when Martin was on top of Zimmerman. Vattel Jun 2013 #78
Perhaps. Igel Jun 2013 #23
several inch long gash? Voice for Peace Jun 2013 #34
If by "several-inch-long gash" you mean Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #35
Yes, the P.A. said one cut was 2 centimeters NOT 2 inches. The other was .5 centimeters and anneboleyn Jun 2013 #53
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2013 #25
Zimmerman outweighed Martin by 37 pounds on the night of the shooting (nt) Captain Stern Jun 2013 #30
Incorrect, police reports Lurks Often Jun 2013 #41
I think all that is both irrelevant and unlikely Warpy Jun 2013 #3
That doesn't make sense to me Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #5
Can you clarify this part? Pelican Jun 2013 #10
He wasn't a cop. Period. Warpy Jun 2013 #12
Ok.. but what made it illegal for him to talk to or interact with Martin? Pelican Jun 2013 #14
He had no real right to confront him, either, Warpy Jun 2013 #16
Based... on... what... law? Pelican Jun 2013 #19
Have you ever had a stranger follow you? I HAVE, by car. I figured it out, pulled into a lot, and WinkyDink Jun 2013 #31
He was also told, by the police dispatcher, to NOT confront TM. nt MADem Jun 2013 #27
Help me understand something about that characterization, because everyone is repeating it Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #37
"We don't need you to do that," is a polite way--to my understanding and when listening MADem Jun 2013 #42
Thanks for clearing that up, MADem. Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #49
I took it as a directive. As I said, perhaps those dispatchers are going to MADem Jun 2013 #55
I'm trying to get some understanding of how dispatchers in that jurisdiction advise callers. Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #59
Could be, or it could be simply a "manner of speaking." MADem Jun 2013 #64
If post #63 is accurate, it seems to be a matter of authority. Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #71
The prime 'supplement' affecting Zimmerman's testosterone might have lumpy Jun 2013 #60
Could be. He killed a young teen who should not have died that day. nt MADem Jun 2013 #62
Umm no. Carlpatrick Jun 2013 #40
When I tell a child or a subordinate, "I don't need you to do that," MADem Jun 2013 #47
Why wasn't it "legally binding" CatWoman Jun 2013 #48
Read Florida Law... Carlpatrick Jun 2013 #63
I wasn't talking to you CatWoman Jun 2013 #75
Yeah you were... Carlpatrick Jun 2013 #79
you joined DU just so you could defend that sorry sack of shit? CatWoman Jun 2013 #77
Not illegal. Just very stupid for a man with a LOADED GUN to CONFRONT a teenager anneboleyn Jun 2013 #58
apparently it was point-blank, if that's the right term.. there were powder burns on the clothing Voice for Peace Jun 2013 #36
The ME classified it as intermediate distance Lurks Often Jun 2013 #45
ok, maybe I misunderstood Voice for Peace Jun 2013 #61
I had to research what the ME considered "intermediate" distance Lurks Often Jun 2013 #80
I just read (somewhere) one person postulating that Voice for Peace Jun 2013 #82
It would also support Zimmerman's story that Martin was on top of him Lurks Often Jun 2013 #83
it makes sense to me that Voice for Peace Jun 2013 #84
Let's hope neither of us ever finds ourselves in such a position Lurks Often Jun 2013 #85
In a conrontation between one armed person, and one unarmed person, Pathwalker Jun 2013 #4
I suspect that at the time of the screaming, the gun was not evident Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #6
and I'm of the opinion that the gun was drawn AND cocked the entire time CatWoman Jun 2013 #51
Honestly, that's what I have been thinking as well. Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #7
GZ's injuries are eerily janlyn Jun 2013 #11
that's also a feasible scenario in this case Voice for Peace Jun 2013 #38
That is clearly a young man scream... slor Jun 2013 #17
GZ does not have a deep voice Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #22
I don't think most people have a particularly deep voice when they are screaming in terror. nt MADem Jun 2013 #50
you can't distinguish between a young voice yelling over that of an older voice? CatWoman Jun 2013 #52
One of the witnesses that testified agrees with you Just Saying Jun 2013 #66
I disagree for two reasons … 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2013 #24
****ZIMMERMAN CLAIMED IN VIDEO TM COVERED HIS MOUTH**** uponit7771 Jun 2013 #28
Why? Because he was screaming? Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #29
It's a common thing when you're grappling with somebody Recursion Jun 2013 #32
My conjecture Captain Stern Jun 2013 #39
I cannot dispute any of those 3 scenarios Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #44
An eye witness has testified that she saw a figure on the ground straddled by lumpy Jun 2013 #68
I think the operative word is that you "believe" tech3149 Jun 2013 #43
I will base my opinions on whatever I choose, thank you Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #46
I don't think your defending GZ tech3149 Jun 2013 #57
For a lot of us that just doesn't cut it DeltaLitProf Jun 2013 #70
You know I'm not a juror on this case, right? Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #73
Wild speculation is fun, but I hope the jury avoids it. Vattel Jun 2013 #65
I disagree, but ... ThePhilosopher04 Jun 2013 #67
Rather than basing its decision on a "feeling" DeltaLitProf Jun 2013 #72
I have two comments. Auntie Bush Jun 2013 #76
it really doesn't matter what anyone 'believes' spanone Jun 2013 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I believe it was Zimmerma...»Reply #56