Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: W.Va. teen who wore NRA shirt won’t be charged, judge says [View all]arely staircase
(12,482 posts)12. I think the case law on that is basically:
the school admin. can ban shirts and other stuff only if it is interfering with the business of teaching and running the school, not just because a teacher or administrator, even rightly, finds it offensive. So the kids have first Amend. rights but they are weighed against the running of the school.
Anyways - an actual lawyer can describe it better.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe you could enlighten me since I don't hangout at Free Republic, NRA, Stormfront, etc.
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#30
Those are the right wing sites that would have an orgasm because one or two black celebrities are
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#38
The arrest was wrong. Prohibiting promotion of guns and the right wing agenda at school makes sense
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#40
He should not have been arrested, but he should have been suspended for wearing
madinmaryland
Jun 2013
#29
A suspension would be a notch or two less stupid but still quite foolish and lawsuit bait.
TheKentuckian
Jun 2013
#56