Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well stated. Recommended. nt sibelian Jun 2013 #1
k&r MotherPetrie Jun 2013 #2
What's wrong with a secret interpretation of law being "monitored" by secret Bonobo Jun 2013 #3
according to many duers, not a damned thing. cali Jun 2013 #5
It's NOT the government behind the spying, it's corporate contractors. fasttense Jun 2013 #6
oh please. it's both. and it's the government leading the way. cali Jun 2013 #35
K&R newfie11 Jun 2013 #4
knr Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #7
So, how do you propose we fix that problem? DCBob Jun 2013 #8
How about appointing an attorney in every case to oppose the government? cali Jun 2013 #10
Yes, I think changes like that should be discussed and might work. DCBob Jun 2013 #11
That's a joke, right? Narkos Jun 2013 #12
It would surely bring down the unemployment rate. reusrename Jun 2013 #61
Oh right because treestar Jun 2013 #64
Change the law. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #58
But what about worshiping Snowden? East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #9
Really? Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #14
I didn't think I needed the sarcasm smilie. East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #15
My bad! Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #23
No problem. East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #25
Getting ENTIRELY impossible to tell now... sibelian Jun 2013 #27
Spooky is what it is. East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #41
Correct. Secrecy and democracy have nothing to do with each other. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #13
So no more infiltrating the KKK or trying to catch child predators or organized crime? randome Jun 2013 #17
Why not arrest them all? Violent murderers and assholes you don't need to fuck around with. bemildred Jun 2013 #18
You can't arrest someone until you have evidence. randome Jun 2013 #24
These are totalitarian police state tactics, Sir. bemildred Jun 2013 #26
Often there are cases where there is "evidence" but not enough to file charges or make an arrest.. DCBob Jun 2013 #29
Right, and then you leave them alone and respect their rights until you get evidence. bemildred Jun 2013 #31
Right, but the FBI might be listening to their phone calls to get that evidence. DCBob Jun 2013 #33
Quite. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #34
You do not 'leave alone' a suspected child molester. You try to get evidence. randome Jun 2013 #39
Your suspicion does not give you any rights to infringe someone elses rights. Period. bemildred Jun 2013 #66
They don't need to break the law. sibelian Jun 2013 #28
Like Snowden did? randome Jun 2013 #47
The naïveté is stunning, isn't it! treestar Jun 2013 #65
The process, so I've heard on DU... randome Jun 2013 #16
You make it sound like the problem caseymoz Jun 2013 #19
excellent point. The approval rate cali Jun 2013 #21
Courts have a similar approval rate, though caseymoz Jun 2013 #60
"1,856 requests resulting in almost 34,000 warrants issued" JaneyVee Jun 2013 #20
gotta link to your claims? cali Jun 2013 #22
You mean a "leak" to her claim... Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #30
Leaked stuff? Metadata collection isn't new. And there are more sources on this than just JaneyVee Jun 2013 #43
"And there are more sources on this than just the government" Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #48
You can find out about all the judges on FISC, they are public JaneyVee Jun 2013 #53
you need some purty blue links Skittles Jun 2013 #62
You'd prefer that government not answer your questions? randome Jun 2013 #44
I've yet to see an attempt to reveal undercover agents other than from Cheney. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #46
We all want more transparency and less secrecy with the NSA. randome Jun 2013 #49
I guess you know from our prior interactions that I pretty much share that view. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #52
Yes, it is easy to get caught up in one side or another. randome Jun 2013 #57
You really think they meticulously perused all 34,000 warrents? East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #38
The judges are the ones who split the warrants, not the FedGov. So I guess, being that JaneyVee Jun 2013 #50
+1000000 n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #32
good morning Catherina cali Jun 2013 #37
Good morning to you lol! Catherina Jun 2013 #45
So ProSense Jun 2013 #36
I'm saying reform it. cali Jun 2013 #42
That's the rub, I think. We cannot know exactly what to reform, since HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #56
Wow, what is all the timbling about, the Fourth Amendment is being followed and now there are Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #40
Agreed. Call your Congressman Recursion Jun 2013 #51
fortunately, I don't have to. that his position cali Jun 2013 #54
Fair enough. And mine can't vote, though she agrees (nt) Recursion Jun 2013 #55
Before FISA was passed there were no checks on the Executive treestar Jun 2013 #59
Except that before it treestar Jun 2013 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The FISA Court is deplora...»Reply #9