Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Glenn Greenwald: NSA Can Store A BILLION CELL PHONE CALLS Every Day [View all]intaglio
(8,170 posts)100. Well you seem to be ignorant of some lies you have issued
That civil rights/liberties can only be violated by government
A direct lie as those using illegal aliens for slave labour are also breaching civil rights/liberties. As Google has found when its Streetview showed unblurred faces.
That communicating information to a private entity during the coarse of doing business with that entity has absolutely no relationship to a government collecting that information
So any transactions with with overseas entities that may want to harm your country cannot be examined?
That stating there is some similarity means there is no privacy at all
There is privacy but not of published information. Dialing a phone number or addressing a letter or addressing an e-mail automatically publishes that information.
By that ridiculous logic the information stored by my doctor or my bank would be fine too...after all, I have given them my info, therefore I must not care who has that info
That is a lie where you are depending upon us not seeing that published information is different from private. If a doctor gives you a prescription for morphine, then presenting that prescription will trigger an enquiry by the pharmacist as to your medical condition and will also probably trigger an enquiry from the FDA.
That the gas station and cell phone company isn't also collecting my phone data, my location data, my financial data, my email data, my internet data, and whothefuckknows what other data
You persist in conflating published information (your number plate, your phone number, your e-mail address, your addressees, the people you call) with private (your financial data) and with data that you have chosen to reveal (your location).
My phone company has a fiduciary responsibility to me and a terms of service which is enforceable civilly and even criminally
This is true but it that fiduciary responsibility cannot extend to keeping the number you call a secret from other networks or, given modern digital routing, the number you are calling from a secret or your location. Smith v Maryland again because you persist in confusing published information with private.
Jeeezuz the amount of ignorance surrounding historical government access to information always required both transparency through release of public information, petitioning of a court with a presiding judge who's oath is soundly based on upholding the constitution of the US who requires a very specific objective on a very specific individual or group of individuals, and for the retrieval of very specific items
Apart from the fact this is word salad (yes that is an ad hom - but a justified one) you continue to display ignorance about the difference between published and private information. Published information can provide evidence for a justified search and seizure, exactly as telephoning Kim Il Jong would provide reason to record and examine your phone call.
No those who see no sideways shit in this whole story are more likely political hacks trying to protect their political interests, are indifferent about the weight of the US government, or are just ignorant of the ability of the government to destroy their life individually or collectively
and i thought mine was an ad hom ...
pipoman please think about what you write and use paragraphs as it aids comprehension of what you are trying to say.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
187 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think what we are suggesting is that the NSA adhere to the 4th amendment.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2013
#2
And we can have that discussion without elevating a RW libertarian douchebag to the status of a hero
baldguy
Jun 2013
#3
You need more talking points. You left out China, Russia, Ecuador, and Cuba.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2013
#5
Did all of those 46% attend the briefings and such about the NSA or its programs et al?
Bodhi BloodWave
Jun 2013
#90
Collins' argument was that you can't request a briefing for things you don't know.
Pholus
Jun 2013
#117
I'm sure you have as much disdain and rejection of the neocon/Bush surveillance state
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#44
Obama ended the NSAs abuses under the Bush Regime, & forced them to get warrants for their wire taps
baldguy
Jun 2013
#52
On behalf of The Carlyle Group, Booz Allen, Academia, Halliburton, Beltek, Stratfor, HB Gary etc
think
Jun 2013
#151
"If the president does it, that means it is not illegal." ~Richard M. Nixon.
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#164
So, what you really want is to impeach Barack Obama. And why not Joe Biden while you're at it.
baldguy
Jun 2013
#166
Funny he didn't mention it. Funny he didn't understand what a secure FTP server is.
randome
Jun 2013
#183
I hadn't consider that the NDAA clause could be used to indefinitely detain Snowden either.
think
Jun 2013
#184
If: I have a problem with Obama's UNCONSTITUTIONAL acts, Then: I want Boenher for president.
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#170
Thank you, what an asshole to alert and ASSume. I =do= vote for democrats.
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#185
No we cant. That's the whole point. People have tried to "have that discussion" in the past and
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#56
What's childish is supposedly rational, supposedly liberal people trying desperately
baldguy
Jun 2013
#59
Mass domestic surveillance has not gone through a 4th amendment challenge.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2013
#10
ah of course. Arguably neither is the information passing over the internet, right?
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2013
#17
There are entire volumes of laws and rules preventing that information from being shared.
randome
Jun 2013
#77
I'm no law or privacy scholar. I have no idea what laws are in place for school records.
randome
Jun 2013
#92
Recording of calls and storing them for a possible evidence in a criminal case without a warrant
boston bean
Jun 2013
#106
HIPAA prevents the reporting of medical records. No such statute applies to telephone metadata.
OilemFirchen
Jun 2013
#136
+1. anything that's on a computer is theirs. and since they're corraling us into putting
HiPointDem
Jun 2013
#180
It's the digital age. Data is never 'given back', it's copied and then deleted.
randome
Jun 2013
#116
But you'll trust Verizon to know all that. They don't have laws preventing misuse.
randome
Jun 2013
#35
Just because there is a law doesnt mean it doesnt violate the Constitution. I suggest you read the
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#64
Well, it wasn't a Communist who told me this, and my hearing was quite good at the time...! nt
MADem
Jun 2013
#114
Now this report by Greenwald shows he does not have any concept of what he is
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#27
Greenwald says, ""It doesn't mean that they're listening to every call, it means they're storing
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#32
Do we have only a billion people in the US who has a cell phone? How many cell phone customers do
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#49
Ummm, the US population is 313.9 million. A factor of 3 smaller than a "billion"
Pholus
Jun 2013
#51
The 2014 NDAA creates a new complex dedicated to the analysis of stored data and metadata.
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#38
How long do you expect a call to last, it does not add up. Longer calls means more storage is taken
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#53
Would you give the government permission to put a camera in every room in your house
Bolo Boffin
Jun 2013
#29
Once again, he could have read about Bush doing this and MORE here on DU many years ago!
Coyotl
Jun 2013
#37
But...but greenwald is a something or other! This means everything he says doesn't matter!
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#42
Prudence Dictates That One Must Make The Assumption That Everything Will Be Recorded
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#60
Any Smart Malcontent Would Surely Avoid All Forms Of Electronic Communication
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#75
Hasn't Echelon already been intercepting / storing over 3 billion / day for decades?
HiddenAgenda63
Jun 2013
#94
And the authoritarians break out their goto talking point: We already knew that!
DesMoinesDem
Jun 2013
#130