Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,426 posts)
15. the clerk wouldn't have standing.
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 01:39 AM
Jun 2013

Possibly a clerk could challenge whether s/he was required to violate his/her religious beliefs by issuing a license - but that would be an entirely different issue, not one of whether the ballot initiative was constitutional.

In a matter of whether a law, or other results of a statewide ballot initiative, is constitutional the parties are a person injured by the law (the couples) and the state itself. An agent of the state doesn't have a cognizable interest independent of the state's interest in the constitutionality of the law.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Prop 8 supporters have fi...»Reply #15