Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
58. Watch and learn grasshopper:
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 01:27 PM
Jun 2013

Sen. Edward Kennedy's Iraq Speech at the National Press Club:



And Teddy is just one of many Democrats in both houses who voted against the IWR in 2003.
Translation: I was for it before I was against it and I was absolutely NEVER for it. ucrdem Jun 2013 #1
+1 nt Progressive dog Jun 2013 #9
Another translation: Lie like A Bagger Whisp Jun 2013 #62
Exactly! It was also in one of my posts, pointing out that fact BlueCaliDem Jun 2013 #64
Great post. Still up too: ucrdem Jun 2013 #69
Thanks, ucrdem. BlueCaliDem Jun 2013 #87
And likewise, BlueCaliDem! ucrdem Jun 2013 #102
It's clear that they don't. BlueCaliDem Jun 2013 #105
Now that's music to my ears! ucrdem Jun 2013 #112
Your posts are like breaths of fresh air BlueCaliDem Jul 2013 #194
~~*~~ Hekate Jul 2013 #190
Thanks, Hekate! BlueCaliDem Jul 2013 #193
You would be amazed at what I "get." Hissyspit Jun 2013 #109
Sounds like a lot of our Democratic leadership at that time as well. progressoid Jun 2013 #128
It's easy for a person to contradict negative assertions against him baldguy Jun 2013 #2
Kind of like, "I never took a dime from CATO and I made much more money working for the ACLU." ucrdem Jun 2013 #3
He never said he didn't take a dime from CATO. More bullshit Hissyspit Jun 2013 #113
Greenwald is a clown...nt SidDithers Jun 2013 #4
He wanted Bush to succeed so much he pretends he did.. Scurrilous Jun 2013 #5
Thank you for providing this valuable information. noamnety Jun 2013 #6
Indeed LondonReign2 Jun 2013 #18
Here's some ProSense Jun 2013 #24
Your phone calls aren't being recorded. Galraedia Jun 2013 #161
If they were recording the conversations noamnety Jun 2013 #164
Because there's no point to it. Galraedia Jun 2013 #165
That's why they just have the phone companies do the recording. They_Live Jul 2013 #199
Yeah, about those phone calls.. You're still in the ignorant hole you've always been in. nm Cha Jun 2013 #183
So you're questioning Greenwald for doing exactly what the Democratic party did? burnodo Jun 2013 #7
I didn't support the Iraq war. ProSense Jun 2013 #11
No Democrat did anything to stop the war burnodo Jun 2013 #16
"I had not abandoned my trust in the Bush administration." ProSense Jun 2013 #26
If Democrats had "abandoned trust in Bush" why did they support the war? burnodo Jun 2013 #37
Finish the quote: Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #116
The entire quote is in the OP. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #118
Oh good grief. Did you hear that on Democracy Now? ucrdem Jun 2013 #39
Democrats are just as responsible for that war as Republicans burnodo Jun 2013 #41
What you actually said was "No Democrat did anything to stop the war." ucrdem Jun 2013 #43
Could you point out anything any Democrat did to stop the war? burnodo Jun 2013 #47
And that ended that. whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #52
Sorry to disappoint but thoughtful answers take a few minutes. ucrdem Jun 2013 #60
Watch and learn grasshopper: ucrdem Jun 2013 #58
Gee Gee's problem isn't that he was hornswaggled, it's that he denigrates others who were MADem Jun 2013 #45
Attacking the messenger, again with distortions of his actual positions, because you don't like MSG usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #8
Greenwald's own words are "distortions"? ProSense Jun 2013 #12
Not at all, just her charecterizations of them are. usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #29
What ProSense doesn't like is tea. nt ucrdem Jun 2013 #15
Another cute picture of Paul Revere Progressive dog Jun 2013 #23
ROFL Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #31
Now that's an ultimate DUZy...! nt MADem Jun 2013 #49
HA! Whisp Jun 2013 #76
LOL lol lol lol lol Iliyah Jun 2013 #110
Duzy! flamingdem Jun 2013 #149
that thing takes up a lot of bandwidth! treestar Jun 2013 #160
Oh no, not THIS nonsense again. Stop, or I shall mock you a 2nd time. JoePhilly Jun 2013 #35
That is all you ever got... lame, childish 'mock' to try and shut down discussion usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #50
You aren't discussing anything. JoePhilly Jun 2013 #54
Lord knows, I tangle with the op, but there was nothing deceitful about the op cali Jun 2013 #89
I disagree. Trying to claim that he supports, Bush, the Iraq war, the Carlye group, is deciteful usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #101
Paul Revere? WTF? BumRushDaShow Jun 2013 #140
You have lost. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #10
I "lost"? ProSense Jun 2013 #14
You have lost. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #25
LOL! ProSense Jun 2013 #36
Consider it a service to all of DU Union Scribe Jun 2013 #44
Are you ProSense Jun 2013 #63
No I'm obsessed with DU Union Scribe Jun 2013 #75
LOL! n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #78
Who did win the Presidency Progressive dog Jun 2013 #20
You should let ProSense handle the "clever" retorts. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #28
I liked it so well, it bore repeating NT Progressive dog Jun 2013 #57
lost it burnodo Jun 2013 #21
Your posts remind of the movie Rainman Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #13
Hey ProSense Jun 2013 #19
You know what? Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #22
LOL! ProSense Jun 2013 #30
I guess we can add gracious in victory to your resume as well! Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #32
Says the person who posts nothing but personal attacks. ProSense Jun 2013 #38
Nope! Not gonna do it! Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #53
Good, ProSense Jun 2013 #56
Hey! When are we going to start smearing and sliming Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #65
Does that ProSense Jun 2013 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #94
I'm totally with you now Prosense! Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #96
Binney again? OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #137
Woo Hoo! Now that's the spirit! Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #158
Did you read the quote? Binney is referring to Snowden. BklnDem75 Jun 2013 #180
That was Binney discussing Snowden. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #182
Good research Progressive dog Jun 2013 #17
Oh, for Christ's sake, give it up. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #27
Greenwald is not a politician, and no I will not "give it up." ProSense Jun 2013 #33
I'm not uncomfortable with his words. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #42
No, ProSense Jun 2013 #46
Indeed...the hypocrite who is flinging shit here is Greenwald. That's what's bugging some! MADem Jun 2013 #55
Wrong. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #66
And we'll soon see your posts condemning these people too then.... progressoid Jun 2013 #125
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Jun 2013 #73
+1 progressoid Jun 2013 #121
You are the one with the consistency problem. woo me with science Jun 2013 #34
Can't quit ProSense Jun 2013 #40
People aren't that stupid, Prosense. woo me with science Jun 2013 #48
You're right, woo me with science. ProSense Jun 2013 #51
What is it with the asinine Rolling on the Floor smilie Hissyspit Jun 2013 #72
. ProSense Jun 2013 #74
Yeah, just like that... Hissyspit Jun 2013 #98
See ProSense Jun 2013 #100
No. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #106
Hey, ProSense Jun 2013 #111
This: Hissyspit Jun 2013 #114
Yeah, ProSense Jun 2013 #117
As I previously said... Hissyspit Jun 2013 #120
What a twisted web you weave... whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #59
Ah, ProSense Jun 2013 #61
The reason, despite your prodigious efforts, you're mostly ineffective whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #80
Say anything and pretend to speak for everyone. LOL! n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #82
Your views:recs ratios of late whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #88
"Your views:recs ratios of late tell the tale" ProSense Jun 2013 #90
You mean the rogue agency you're carrying water for? whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #92
Oooh, that's deep. ProSense Jun 2013 #99
Another Explanation Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #67
Yeah, that's me. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #70
GeeGee is a liar and a fake BlueCaliDem Jun 2013 #68
So having been called out for repetitive homophobic name calling noamnety Jun 2013 #93
I got to wonder why you are working so hard to smear people. L0oniX Jun 2013 #71
Do you oppose the mass surveillance of ordinary people by government agencies? Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #79
"We have ways of making you talk!" Maybe, ProSense Jun 2013 #84
so you cannot answer the question? Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #91
LOL! ProSense Jun 2013 #97
You still have not answered the question I asked. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #138
Oh brother ProSense Jun 2013 #139
Gotcha moment? No. I did not understand if you supported or opposed Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #143
Are you ProSense Jun 2013 #145
So your position is that nothing like a massive surveillance of the American people Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #146
May I ProSense Jun 2013 #151
So that would be a "yes" your position is that there is no massive Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #154
No. ProSense Jun 2013 #155
So you will be posting here against the Obama administration Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #169
Yes, ProSense Jun 2013 #171
Some of my confusion has to do with certain ambiguities in your replies. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #172
On edit, ProSense Jun 2013 #173
Once again you seem to be avoiding a direct answer. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #174
Here: ProSense Jun 2013 #175
It is a simple yes or no question. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #176
"It is a simple yes or no question." ProSense Jun 2013 #177
So you are refusing to answer this simple question in order to keep your thread kicked? Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #178
No, I'm LMAO. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #179
That again does not appear to answer the question. Warren Stupidity Jul 2013 #192
It looks like ProSense answered you 81 posts ago, in reply #97. nt ucrdem Jul 2013 #187
No actually in that post she claimed there was no massive domestic surveillance Warren Stupidity Jul 2013 #191
She opposed it vociferously under Bush: woo me with science Jun 2013 #86
Can't quit ProSense Jun 2013 #95
"Oh. Only commie stooges, huh?" usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #141
And the swarm descends. ucrdem Jun 2013 #81
Here's my favorite GREENWALDism from the same link, which I will use on his fans who call names UTUSN Jun 2013 #83
No doubt about it, that's truly lame and those are weasel words. cali Jun 2013 #85
Not really, it sounds he's explaining his growth, Hissyspit Jun 2013 #103
"he's explaining his growth"? ProSense Jun 2013 #115
I admit I haven't read every word Greenwald has ever written. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #123
You mean ProSense Jun 2013 #126
So you can't. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #142
Well, ProSense Jun 2013 #144
x2 n/t AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #157
Wow. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #124
Wow, talk about a non-response. ProSense Jun 2013 #127
No, he said Hissyspit Jun 2013 #129
No, he said ProSense Jun 2013 #130
"Clearly, it's bullshit." No, it's not. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #132
Yes, it's bullshit. Thanks, I fixed the second part. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #133
Link please usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #166
Oh gee, G. sheshe2 Jun 2013 #104
Is there something wrong with that? Hissyspit Jun 2013 #107
Meh. bvar22 Jun 2013 #108
Not since the very dead Breitbart... OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #119
Not since the Bush administration Hissyspit Jun 2013 #122
Not since the advent of the Purity Progressives OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #131
Not since the rise of the Sensible Woodchucks LondonReign2 Jun 2013 #147
jesus christ prosense half the clowns in this admin you adore supported the iraq war. nt boilerbabe Jun 2013 #134
Are you saying Greenwald is a "clown" for supporting the Iraq war? n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #135
This is why you fail whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #148
Actually, ProSense Jun 2013 #150
Actually nothing whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #152
LOL! ProSense Jun 2013 #153
You know the story of the Red Shoes don't you? whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #156
Not one DUer supported the Iraq invasion. Not one. Robb Jun 2013 #136
Then how do you explain that 1/2 of the Democratic Party, bvar22 Jun 2013 #167
Party, schmarty. None of us were fooled. Robb Jun 2013 #170
And you have a selective memory. bvar22 Jul 2013 #195
Horseshit. Show me one post. Robb Jul 2013 #196
Those archives don't exist, (except maybe at the NSA), bvar22 Jul 2013 #197
First of all, the Iraq invasion was 2003, not 2002. Robb Jul 2013 #198
Greenwald, through his early support for Bush as many Americans were after 9/11, did less AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #159
Glenn "The Lyin Libertarian" Greedwald praised the Citizens United decision... Galraedia Jun 2013 #162
Then trash the American Civil Liberties Union, too. deurbano Jun 2013 #184
Yep, Greenwald debunked that meme very tidily. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2013 #163
Yeah, ProSense Jun 2013 #168
He had no curiousity about NAFTA, Bush v. Gore, Telecommunications Act, the World Bank, climate, etc Kolesar Jun 2013 #181
Oh, Greenwald is definitely "touchy about other people supporting PBO" just don't Cha Jun 2013 #185
P.S. Greenwald doesn't mind all "the creepy reverence" Cha Jun 2013 #186
The Hypocrisy of Glenn Greenwald, Iraq War edition Cha Jul 2013 #188
QFT - Quote for Truth! ucrdem Jul 2013 #189
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is Greenwald's debun...»Reply #58