Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
11. I guess the New Yorker had a year to get used to the cover before printing it.
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 12:34 PM
Jun 2013

Gawker says the idea was a year old and just slightly updated before put to press. http://gawker.com/that-bert-ernie-new-yorker-cover-has-been-on-the-inte-608776824

I think most of the flak is not home grown but the media jumping on any story that puts PBS in a controversial spotlight. Heck it has worked since they have successfully gotten funding cut for their only competition in the news reporting business. PBS also has less money for new dramas.

It is sad. With increased spectrum, if we funded PBS properly we could have four channels to choose from each offering us REAL history or the arts or children's programming or science. And no conglomerate could come in and buy the station and replace the educational programming with reality shows.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm sure I'll catch some flak over this, but I don't feel it was appropriate to use Arkansas Granny Jun 2013 #1
yes we musn't poison the minds of children with all this gay is good stuff eh? nt msongs Jun 2013 #3
really a nonsensical reply burnodo Jun 2013 #6
Are they portrayed as gay on the cover of the magazine? yardwork Jun 2013 #16
I don't think anyone's mind is being poisoned, but I think it's Arkansas Granny Jun 2013 #10
Discussion of marriage is not a discussion of sexual matters and I'm offended that you compare it to yardwork Jun 2013 #15
Be offended if it suits you. Arkansas Granny Jun 2013 #17
You ain't worth it. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2013 #4
I am pretty sure pre-schoolers are not reading New Yorker. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2013 #5
To make what point? That it's ok for Bert and Ernie to snuggle together on the couch? yardwork Jun 2013 #9
It's not about sex or even about marriage. I just don't see Arkansas Granny Jun 2013 #12
Your second paragraph refutes your first paragraph. yardwork Jun 2013 #14
Bert & Ernie janlyn Jun 2013 #2
It's pretty stupid. I watched "Sesame Street" with my kids and there was never any suggestion Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #7
Truth be known I would have preferred a real couple dsc Jun 2013 #8
I guess the New Yorker had a year to get used to the cover before printing it. gvstn Jun 2013 #11
I hadn't tonight about it in that light, but it gives Arkansas Granny Jun 2013 #13
The whole liberal MSM thing drives me crazy. gvstn Jun 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Yorker's Bert And Ern...»Reply #11