Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Here is Obama's "most transparent White House in history" for you: [View all]
The Obama White House has classified the entire text of the Trans-Pacific Pact (TPP) trade deal -- a deal guaranteed to make you and your family more poor and more powerless.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/18/alan-grayson-trans-pacific-partnership_n_3456167.html
Alan Grayson On Trans-Pacific Partnership: Obama Secrecy Hides 'Assault On Democratic Government'
Posted: 06/18/2013 11:24 am EDT | Updated: 06/18/2013 5:20 pm EDT
WASHINGTON -- Progressive Democrats in Congress are ramping up pressure on the Obama administration to release the text of Trans-Pacific Partnership, a secretive free trade agreement with 10 other nations, amid intensifying controversy over the administration's transparency record and its treatment of classified information.
The only publicly available information on the terms of the deal has come from leaks, some of which have alarmed public health experts, environmentalist groups and consumer advocates. According to a document leaked in the summer of 2012, the deal would allow corporations to directly challenge government laws and regulations in international courts.
Members of Congress have been provided with only limited access to the negotiation documents. Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) told HuffPost on Monday that he viewed an edited version of the negotiation texts last week, but that secrecy policies at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative created scheduling difficulties that delayed his access for nearly six weeks. The Obama administration has barred any Congressional staffers from reviewing the full negotiation text and prohibited members of Congress from discussing the specific terms of the text with trade experts and reporters. Staffers on some committees are granted access to portions of the text under their committee's jurisdiction.
"Having seen what I've seen, I would characterize this as a gross abrogation of American sovereignty," Grayson told HuffPost. "And I would further characterize it as a punch in the face to the middle class of America. I think that's fair to say from what I've seen so far. But I'm not allowed to tell you why!"
Obama, earlier this year:
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/02/15/transparency-withhold-targeted-killing-information-obama/
This is the most transparent administration in history and I can document how that is the case. Everything from every visitor that comes into the White House is now part of the public record thats something that we changed. Just about every law that we pass, every law that we implement, we put online for everybody to see.
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here is Obama's "most transparent White House in history" for you: [View all]
brentspeak
Jun 2013
OP
What fun would that be? No, it's much more enjoyable to complain about being uninformed...
Blanks
Jun 2013
#11
I knew you wouldnt commit yourself. You guys never do unless you are certain
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#47
2005, but these negotiations, from what's been leaked (the negotiations have been going on
cali
Jun 2013
#49
What I typed is quite similar to what you typed, don't you think? Not exactly the same,
bike man
Jun 2013
#26
Thanks for that link....I think you save a lot of "progressives", if they read the AVAILABLE(!!)....
George II
Jun 2013
#36
does that mean if anyone leaks details of tpp, they can be chrged with being an enemy of the
HiPointDem
Jun 2013
#4
As Ron Kirk, the chief negotiator, alluded to. If we knew what was in it we'd stop it.
pa28
Jun 2013
#7
I had to lol when I heard Obama say something about govt respecting the rights of its citizens.
Apophis
Jun 2013
#12
Our government is very handy at classifying anything that might not go well with the public.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#34
It's 'classified' because if the public knew what was in it, it wouldn't pass.
X_Digger
Jun 2013
#37
No doubt in my mind that Congress will pass it by a large majority. They're all in it together
forestpath
Jun 2013
#32
DemocracyNow! on the TPP "Leaked Doc Shows Obama Wants to Help Corporarations Avoid Regulations"
Catherina
Jun 2013
#38
I'm wondering how long it will be for DemocracyNow to get thrown under the bus by the worshippers.
L0oniX
Jul 2013
#94
So you're calling Alan Grayson and Elizaeth Warren liars, are you?
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#65
Grayson and Warren offered OPINIONS on the still-not-completed "agreement"...
George II
Jul 2013
#77
Restricted permanently or just while the agreement is still under negotiation?
George II
Jul 2013
#83
It is no secret that the Obama administration has been criticized by both sides.....
George II
Jul 2013
#84
Post #65 contains a quote from Elizabeth Warren. I hope she is trustworthy enough for you?
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#66
If you read the entire quote in post #65 you would know why you don't see those names.
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#72
So you didn't read the quote or you are calling Elizabeth Warren a lier. Which one is it?
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#91
That quote clearly explains why you don't see any names in it. Or why you don't see any names
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#108
What I read is quoted below, together with a link to definition of "corporate stakeholder"
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#110
I am looking forward to reading your apology to pa28! Now that you know where the 600 number came
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#115
I doubt my opponent would apologise, so please accept my apologies for their rude behaviour.
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#118
I knew it was very unlikely you would apologise. That's why I apologised for you. :)
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#124
There are some who want things to remain exactly as they are, despite the problems
Fire Walk With Me
Jul 2013
#106
Probably because of the sweeping climate change regulations Obama has demanded be inserted in it. nt
raouldukelives
Jul 2013
#89
Giving up some of our sovereignity to court rulings would be a good thing, IMO.
randome
Jul 2013
#97