Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That is, indeed, a very good question. uppityperson Jun 2013 #1
You are implying that a person actually has to sustain a grievous or fatal injury Azathoth Jun 2013 #2
I think the implication is there is a huge difference between "oh shit! I'm gonna die!" and "oh, uppityperson Jun 2013 #4
The "oh never mind" doesn't occur while someone is straddling you Azathoth Jun 2013 #6
Except the testimony provided under oath Coccydynia Jun 2013 #26
What trial are you watching? All the state eyewitnesses put the man in a dark shirt (Trayvon) shadowrider Jun 2013 #33
I think you are color blind, or perhaps Coccydynia Jun 2013 #34
there is conflicting testimony as to who was on top DrDan Jun 2013 #41
As is always the case. Coccydynia Jun 2013 #43
he does support Z's case DrDan Jun 2013 #47
Most of the witnesses didn't look outside until after the gunshot. Travis_0004 Jun 2013 #42
Holding down the hands of a dead man. Coccydynia Jun 2013 #44
Can't tell the difference between dark red and "dark" colors in the dark. yardwork Jun 2013 #82
One of those witness also claims that Z shot TM three times in the back. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #89
Forensics do not support TM on top. Coccydynia Jun 2013 #90
Isn't that the way Zimmerman is now portraying his injuries? The OP is saying that Zimmerman's pacalo Jun 2013 #5
Zimmerman has always maintained that he acted in self defense Azathoth Jun 2013 #7
Link, please, showing reputable source showing that to be true. uppityperson Jun 2013 #8
Link for what? What did I say that is so controversial it needs to be sourced? nt Azathoth Jun 2013 #10
"he, or at least his family, did claim that his nose was broken, and we now that to be true." uppityperson Jun 2013 #11
Which part do you want sourced? The claim that his nose was broken, or the fact it is true? Azathoth Jun 2013 #12
To simplify, "we now know that to be true". Link? nt uppityperson Jun 2013 #13
I'm not clear what you think I'm making up here Azathoth Jun 2013 #14
Ah, a year old abc story. Thank you. I was hoping for something more like x-rays or medical report uppityperson Jun 2013 #15
So, what does that mean? I didn't break into the hospital and steal his x-rays for you, Azathoth Jun 2013 #16
Why do you act like that? I ask for a link and you get all nasty and accusatory. uppityperson Jun 2013 #17
I produced a credible link and your response came off as dismissive. Azathoth Jun 2013 #18
thank you, that is all I had seen, that it "appeared" but no confirmed diagnosis. They are releasing uppityperson Jun 2013 #21
Fair enough. It seems to me something of a hair-splitting point, though n/t Azathoth Jun 2013 #22
Unconfirmed diagnosis = not accurate or true diagnosis. uppityperson Jun 2013 #24
That doesn't necessarily follow, or at least the 'not accurate' part doesn't follow Azathoth Jun 2013 #28
A PA's unconfirmed diagnosis may or may not be true or accurate but should not be held up as fact. uppityperson Jun 2013 #52
So now a Physician's Assistant is not qualified to diagnose a broken nose? Azathoth Jun 2013 #77
You miss the point. Not without a diagnosis and you seem to only want to be insulting, not discuss. uppityperson Jun 2013 #78
Ah, ok, I get the act Azathoth Jun 2013 #79
Projection. eom uppityperson Jun 2013 #80
if his nose was broken, why didn't he go to the hospital? HiPointDem Jun 2013 #31
And why did he not follow up with the ENT like he was told to? I agree. uppityperson Jun 2013 #51
No evidence that Zimmerman's nose was broken by Martin. None. yardwork Jun 2013 #83
he thought it was serious enough to kill him JI7 Jun 2013 #20
True, and if confronted by a stalker with a gun, I'd be frightened for my life HereSince1628 Jun 2013 #45
Zimmerman thought it was greivous. Sheepshank Jun 2013 #56
But he did sustain the head bashing treestar Jun 2013 #72
There's no evidence, other than Z's own words, that TM did the bashing uponit7771 Jun 2013 #75
His own words might have some bolstering had he gone to the hospital treestar Jun 2013 #76
Because he didn't have a lawyer to do the pre-calculating for him. pacalo Jun 2013 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #9
I've said the same from the beginning TorchTheWitch Jun 2013 #19
because AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #23
So the photos taken by the police that night aren't proof he was injured? n/t Azathoth Jun 2013 #25
I don't trust the police at that particular station. AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #27
people seem to forget(or want to forget)there was the whole problem JI7 Jun 2013 #29
Hat tip to Charles Blow who was outraged by no charges AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #30
Actually, Dr. Fredric Rieders committed perjury about the EDTA. reusrename Jun 2013 #88
I've seen numerous photos of Zimmerman taken that night that look like he is perfectly fine. yardwork Jun 2013 #84
The pics were taken by a neighbor at the scene B2G Jun 2013 #48
Really? Which pictures are those? As I said, I've been busy elsewhere, not following daily and would uppityperson Jun 2013 #53
Joe Manalo took them with his iphone B2G Jun 2013 #60
Thank you, I appreciate it. Off to read. uppityperson Jun 2013 #62
You're welcome n/t B2G Jun 2013 #63
Of course he wasnt in fear of being killed. darkangel218 Jun 2013 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #35
Enjoy your stay. nt darkangel218 Jun 2013 #36
Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #38
Not defending Zimmerman, cause I pretty much think he's guilty justiceischeap Jun 2013 #37
I wonder if the 2 mugging you feared for their lives also. Since Z was the one pursuing with the gun uppityperson Jun 2013 #54
That's fair. And I believe that Trayvon Martin felt that he was being mugged or attacked. yardwork Jun 2013 #86
I totally agree but I'm just stating that you can be in fear of your life without justiceischeap Jun 2013 #87
No insurance? Sienna86 Jun 2013 #39
This is an astonishingly silly question. dairydog91 Jun 2013 #40
*If* Martin did slam Zimmerman's head into the pavement. If. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2013 #46
Did they really say that? FunkyLeprechaun Jun 2013 #49
Exactly. It doesn't make any sense at all. uppityperson Jun 2013 #55
Imagine this, you're in an auto accident Savannahmann Jun 2013 #50
Here is where your scenario breaks down"You laugh about the fear, because thankfully nobody got hurt uppityperson Jun 2013 #57
Hardly. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #58
My, was such a reply really necessary to a simple disagreement of part of what you wrote? uppityperson Jun 2013 #59
Absolutely Savannahmann Jun 2013 #61
And rather than civil discussion you stoop to insults. Interesting. uppityperson Jun 2013 #64
A civil discussion requires both people to communicate honestly. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #66
I disagreed with part of what you said, you attacked me and insulted me. Do you want discussion or uppityperson Jun 2013 #67
Your disagreement was an intentional misrepresentation. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #68
Oh. Kay. I agree that adrenaline during an incident makes things different. Time changes. Perception uppityperson Jun 2013 #69
Because he knew... TeeYiYi Jun 2013 #65
Good argument treestar Jun 2013 #70
Several years ago a car driven by an intoxicated person clipped a telephone pole ... spin Jun 2013 #71
Drugs in his system madokie Jun 2013 #73
I can only assume it's because what the cop on the witnrss stand said. egduj Jun 2013 #74
As someone else stated pipi_k Jun 2013 #81
Because he is tough, due to the fact he carries a gun. Kingofalldems Jun 2013 #85
Spam deleted by MIR Team sandieg Dec 2013 #91
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did Zimmerman Refuse ...»Reply #83