Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 03:41 PM Jun 2013

Do you support Senator Leahy's Patriot Act/FISA reform bill? [View all]

The FISA Accountability and Privacy Protection Act of 2013

June 26, 2013

For Background Purposes

Public revelations about two classified data collection programs have brought renewed attention to the powerful Government surveillance authorities contained in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), particularly the impact on law-abiding Americans of provisions in the USA PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. The Director of National Intelligence has acknowledged that they are being conducted pursuant to Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT and Section 702 of FISA. The FISA Accountability and Privacy Protection Act of 2013 will improve the privacy protections and accountability provisions associated with these authorities, and also strengthen oversight and transparency with regard to other provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act. Summarized below are some of the highlights of the bill’s provisions:

New and Shorter Sunset Provisions to Ensure Proper Oversight

  • Shortens the sunset for the FISA Amendments Act from December 2017 to June 2015. The June 2015 sunset would align with expiring USA PATRIOT Act provisions, and enable Congress to address these FISA provisions all at once, instead of in a piecemeal fashion.

  • Adds new June 2015 sunsets on statutes authorizing use of National Security Letters (NSLs).

Higher Standards for PATRIOT Act Surveillance Authorities

  • Elevates the threshold standard for obtaining records through Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act by requiring the government to show relevance to an authorized investigation and a link to one of three categories of a foreign agent, power, or group.

  • Requires that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court approve minimization procedures for data collected under Section 215.

  • Requires the government to provide a statement of the facts and circumstances to justify its belief that the Section 215 records for tangible things, or Pen Register and Trap and Trace Devices (PR/TT) sought are relevant to an authorized investigation to obtain foreign intelligence information.

  • Strikes the one-year waiting period before a recipient can challenge a nondisclosure order for Section 215 orders and strikes the conclusive presumption in favor of the government on nondisclosure.

  • Requires the FBI to retain an internal statement of facts demonstrating the relevance of information sought to its investigation before it can issue a National Security Letter (NSL).

  • For “roving” wiretaps, requires law enforcement to identify “with particularity” the target of a wiretap request under FISA.

Increased Transparency and Public Reporting

  • Expands public reporting on the use of National Security Letters and authorities under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, including an unclassified report on the impact of the use of these authorities on the privacy of United States persons.

  • Fixes a constitutional deficiency found by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Doe v. Mukasey by shifting the burden to the government to seek a court order for an NSL non-disclosure order, and allows the recipient of such a non-disclosure order to challenge it at any time.

Increased Judicial Review and Inspector General Oversight

  • Requires Inspector General audits on the use of Section 215 orders, NSLs, and other surveillance authorities under the USA PATRIOT Act.

  • Provides for a comprehensive review of FISA Amendments Act (Section 702) surveillance by the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG).

  • Clarifies the scope of the annual reviews for Section 702 currently required by the law, in order to cover all agencies that have targeting or minimization procedures approved by the FISA Court.
http://www.leahy.senate.gov/press/the-fisa-accountability-and-privacy-protection-act-of-2013


The co-sponsors include Senators Richard Blumenthal, Jon Tester, Mark Udall and Ron Wyden.

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You know, this would have gone better from someone else. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #1
+1 cali Jun 2013 #2
LOL! Yeah, that went over well. ProSense Jun 2013 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author cali Jun 2013 #12
Of course, ProSense Jun 2013 #14
pot meet kettle. and I didn't pen that. cali Jun 2013 #15
No ProSense Jun 2013 #21
Transparency ProSense Jun 2013 #24
Last tag! Cirque du So-What Jun 2013 #32
Jury results Cha Jun 2013 #36
Thanks. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #38
Sorry, I didn't think it posted so I did it again.. I think Cha Jun 2013 #41
o gawd. Whisp Jun 2013 #37
Oh no, ProSense Jun 2013 #40
... Cha Jul 2013 #46
Sorry, it posted twice.. Cha Jun 2013 #39
I would consider it a blessing, if I were you. Number23 Jul 2013 #56
You don't consider the link she provided to be an acceptable source? JaneyVee Jun 2013 #5
LOL! n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #8
Or are Democratic Senators Leahy, Blumenthal, Tester, Udall and Wyden not acceptable here? freshwest Jun 2013 #44
Wow, ProSense Jun 2013 #6
We have too many rw libertarians masquerading as liberals/progressives on this site arely staircase Jul 2013 #49
No, I was pointing out the substance of your posts on the issue Savannahmann Jul 2013 #51
Bullshit treestar Jun 2013 #17
Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #22
Try to get over it. nt ucrdem Jul 2013 #47
....."Elevates the threshold standard for obtaining records.... sibelian Jun 2013 #3
There is only one reason they are doing this, any of those in Congress. Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #4
oh please. this is just the newest iteration that Senator Leahy has introduced cali Jun 2013 #10
He is not doing enough. Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #13
no, he's not. and if you informed yourself by doing a little research, you'd know that cali Jun 2013 #18
One who see the pantry lines growing. Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #23
one who is on foodstamps (me) cali Jun 2013 #26
He is doing stuff for his small area... Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #33
That is just stupid. Leahy is a stalwart defender of civil liberties and social justice. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #27
No, people trying to make a TRAITOR a hero is stupid. Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #31
oh for fuck's sake. Now Pat Leahy is a traitor? Only in your mind. cali Jul 2013 #45
No, Snowden is the traitor and people are making him a hero. Lady Freedom Returns Jul 2013 #52
It doesn't go nearly far enough. BlueStreak Jun 2013 #9
Looks good - THIS is the conversation we should be having! jazzimov Jun 2013 #11
Sounds very good treestar Jun 2013 #16
I support ANYTHING that limits the government's ability to surveil its citizens. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #19
Too many Republicans, Art_from_Ark Jul 2013 #48
I guess the real question is, will the white house? usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #20
Lol! +1000 whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #25
This is worth discussing. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #28
"Unlike a lot of stuff this poster has been stinking the place up with lately. " ProSense Jun 2013 #30
I calls 'em as I sees 'em. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #34
Please do ProSense Jun 2013 #35
+1 Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #43
Sure, yeah. I have no doubt that the potential for abuse is high in the current system. BenzoDia Jun 2013 #29
Two Things: Skip Intro Jun 2013 #42
well let us know when it's ok nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #50
Kick! n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #53
K&R BumRushDaShow Jul 2013 #54
Surprised this thread doesnt have more recs. bunnies Jul 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you support Senator Le...