Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kind of a disgusting post. TransitJohn Jun 2013 #1
Sorry, but your post is equally disgusting. Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #40
I disagree. This bottom-of-the-barrel character assassination reads exactly like the Marr Jun 2013 #85
We'll call it a tie. But, I am curious: Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #88
FOX News may be one. nt ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #126
Yes it does! Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #105
It's not a smear if there's no mud to smear with. A private defense lawyer pnwmom Jun 2013 #92
and the ACLU didn't have to defend the Skokie Nazis cali Jul 2013 #106
Keep trying. The Link Jun 2013 #2
+1 Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #38
Even bad people are entitled to legal representation NoPasaran Jun 2013 #3
The despicable propaganda machine woo me with science Jun 2013 #9
+1 nt laundry_queen Jul 2013 #122
That's what makes us civilized Kolesar Jun 2013 #82
Everyone gets counsel. The Constituon guaranfuckingtees it. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #4
Show me where in the Constitution it guarantees an attorney for a civil matter? msanthrope Jun 2013 #45
So, it's also fair to say then naaman fletcher Jun 2013 #56
It would seem thus... so vehemently opposed that he used unethical means and violated cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #70
On behalf of a neo-Nazi. And lost. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #128
The Constitution protects your right to denounce lawyers for doing their job. Jim Lane Jul 2013 #110
Thanks! This proves the NSA is not spying on us adric mutelovic Jun 2013 #5
lol Matariki Jun 2013 #58
+1. To the point. n/t Smarmie Doofus Jun 2013 #86
Whew. That's a relief. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #98
And the ACLU defended the First Amendment rights of NAZIs. MNBrewer Jun 2013 #6
Thus, Obama does not spy on the American people and the NSA are breaking no laws! Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #7
Grotesque. sibelian Jun 2013 #8
It's getting clearer and clearer that the NSA isn't spying on us? adric mutelovic Jun 2013 #10
:) sibelian Jun 2013 #18
Desperater and desperater LOL. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #11
And he acted unethically while serving as defense counsel... SidDithers Jun 2013 #12
Is this why he had to stop being a real lawyer to start calling himself a "journalist"? baldguy Jun 2013 #15
No, I think it just shows that he wasn't much of a lawyer... SidDithers Jun 2013 #19
He wasn't disbarred for civil rights violations? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #23
Maybe it's made up? MNBrewer Jun 2013 #27
It's not... SidDithers Jun 2013 #30
I don't know...nt SidDithers Jun 2013 #28
According to the NY bar association, he is "suspended," not "disbarred." MADem Jul 2013 #100
You forgot to quote this bit, Sid MNBrewer Jun 2013 #52
And, as msanthrope said in he other thread... SidDithers Jun 2013 #61
Well,my valuation of misanthrope's opinions is about as high as of yours. MNBrewer Jun 2013 #64
Yeah, we all know you got locked out of that thread for your opinion of msanthrope... SidDithers Jun 2013 #67
I stand by it. MNBrewer Jun 2013 #69
Desperation is ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #13
So you oppose the right to counsel woo me with science Jun 2013 #14
Describe the right to counsel for a civil matter. Trademark was the first case for Hale msanthrope Jun 2013 #35
Shame on you. Just shame on you. woo me with science Jun 2013 #48
Oh please...the system does not need attorneys to represent neo-Nazis msanthrope Jul 2013 #125
You really can't sink much lower with this smearing garbage. woo me with science Jul 2013 #131
I have no problem with Glenn. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2013 #16
I didn't realize defense lawyers are also considered guilty of whatever cases they take quinnox Jun 2013 #17
You know, neither did I Link Speed Jun 2013 #34
Tell us how a trademark case is a criminal matter? Because that was the original msanthrope Jun 2013 #39
if you think the OP makes a good argument, you may be suffering from “GDS“ quinnox Jun 2013 #43
So he opposed a neo-Nazi group then? n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #71
On behalf of a neo-Nazi. And lost. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #124
That's a yes. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #130
Glenn Greenwald broke my pencil n/t leftstreet Jun 2013 #20
That client should sue for malpractice treestar Jun 2013 #21
so, WTF does that have to do with the MASSIVE SPYING by our Government? usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #22
That's what lawyers do. KittyWampus Jun 2013 #24
Thank you for your principled post. BlueCheese Jul 2013 #132
Ignore LittleBlue Jun 2013 #25
So while you have the right to an attorney Savannahmann Jun 2013 #26
You have a right to an attorney in a civil case? His first representation of Hale was msanthrope Jun 2013 #42
Yes. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #51
There's no right to an attorney in a civil matter. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #127
Tell that to the other party Savannahmann Jul 2013 #139
so you dislike the right to a fair trial? RainDog Jun 2013 #29
Ridiculous post. truebluegreen Jun 2013 #31
So? premium Jun 2013 #32
What a filthy, undemocratic and vile sentiment this post expresses. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #33
+100000000 woo me with science Jun 2013 #59
+1 Marr Jun 2013 #83
ROFL Oilwellian Jun 2013 #36
I think the OP may be suffering from "Greenwald Derangement Syndrome" quinnox Jun 2013 #37
It would seem that the OP has cut and run. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #73
-1 Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #41
Hard to know how to reply to such bullshit! Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #44
Just for the record, I've represented hundreds of really bad people in my 19 years DefenseLawyer Jun 2013 #46
Obama's DOJ refuses to prosecute war and Wall Street criminals. Obama named John Brennan, a torture MotherPetrie Jun 2013 #47
And, Lincoln once defended a man who killed dog. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #49
Tom Durkin, well known Chicago criminal lawyer, was originally retained TomClash Jun 2013 #50
+1! markpkessinger Jul 2013 #138
how DARE the criminally charged have lawyers Skittles Jun 2013 #53
please refrain G_j Jun 2013 #54
Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #55
sounds about right.. DCBob Jun 2013 #57
laughable post Matariki Jun 2013 #60
I'm thinking you meant to post this on one of those other sites. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #62
Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #63
I'd like to add my condemnation of this post. It's disgusting. Demit Jun 2013 #65
Telling thread. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #66
Crazy huh? whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #68
I'm usually the first one to get on GG about anything... Chan790 Jun 2013 #72
+1 n/t zappaman Jun 2013 #78
Gee, he must be a Jewish Nazi, then. Thanks for the info. Also, glad you proved 20score Jun 2013 #74
Ahhh. The smell of desperation in the evening is delightful, indeed! eom Purveyor Jun 2013 #75
And the character assassination sinks even further into Breitbart territory. Marr Jun 2013 #76
I want to thank the 5 who rec'd this for ensuring its presence on The Greatest Page. I would have cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #77
Your hate for Greenwald is noted. neverforget Jun 2013 #79
If only Dems got a tenth of the avid support RW Obama-bashers get on DU. . . ucrdem Jun 2013 #80
ASSOCIATIONS!!! Iggo Jun 2013 #81
Is his real name "denmark"? 'cause there's something rotten about him. UTUSN Jun 2013 #84
Have you ever heard of a news channel called CNN? The Straight Story Jun 2013 #87
Thank you all for proving that "**IT'S NOT ABOUT GREENWALD!!!!**" is total & complete bullshit. baldguy Jun 2013 #89
Kick! cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #90
you are an idiot RainDog Jun 2013 #91
I thought this wasn't about Greenwald? baldguy Jun 2013 #95
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #97
It wasn’t about Ellsberg, either, but that didn’t stop Nixon (& associates) from trying to smear him deurbano Jul 2013 #103
^ cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #96
So you posted flamebait to get a certain reaction? Union Scribe Jul 2013 #104
I'm guessing your alert failed? baldguy Jul 2013 #118
^ cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #112
Thank you for keeping this kicked to show everyone what hypocrites the Snowden fans are. baldguy Jul 2013 #119
Always a pleasure. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #123
First Law of Holes WilliamPitt Jul 2013 #121
Kick! cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #136
Yeah, well...I once found a sack of quarters by the side of the road. Zorra Jun 2013 #93
Everyone deserves a defense lawyer Marrah_G Jun 2013 #94
Those who respect the Constitution will readily disagree with you. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #99
Wasn't he doing his job? bravenak Jul 2013 #101
silly op. for reasons to obvious to get into. cali Jul 2013 #102
more evidence that authoritarians simply don't understand the values of western democracy Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #107
Thanks for the link, baldguy Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #108
The silver lining here is that so many have disagreed with you. Jim Lane Jul 2013 #109
Guilt by association? Tseko Jul 2013 #111
Yep. Iggo Jul 2013 #115
I'm no fan of Greenwald, but this MineralMan Jul 2013 #113
I worked for an attorney -- Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2013 #114
DU is going after lawyers now? burnodo Jul 2013 #116
What an utterly embarrassing post. This says far more about you than it does about Greenwald. Wow. myrna minx Jul 2013 #117
Even the Devil has the right to counsel. WilliamPitt Jul 2013 #120
"It's OK for ME to wiretap folk cuz I'm Glenn Greenwald!" struggle4progress Jul 2013 #129
John Adams defended the Boston Massacre soldiers. Arkana Jul 2013 #133
Well lookee there. Zoeisright Jul 2013 #134
And this makes the US government spying on Americans okay HOW? n/t BlueStater Jul 2013 #135
And John Adams defended the British soldiers who carried out the Boston Massacre , , , markpkessinger Jul 2013 #137
Attacking a lawyer for who his clients are is just pathetic. (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #140
this didn't exactly play out the way you had anticipated, did it? frylock Jul 2013 #141
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In 2005, Glenn Greenwald ...»Reply #25