Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5. 3 possibilities
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 08:57 PM
Jun 2013

1) You are being sarcastic. If so -----> forgiven
2) This story, which I wrote, is a lie. If so, please point out *where* you think I lied and about *what*. Please support your statement with documentation of some kind.
3) This story is old news. This is clearly untrue as I'm quoting Classified documents leaked on Thursday and the story went up Friday.

It was bad enough that DU saw fit to shut this story down once. First they claimed only "reputable mainstream" articles may be posted in LBN. When I pointed out that we have been in print for 43 years they declared it to be "commentary" rather than news.

Perhaps if I re-wrote the story without the words "Obama" and "Pelosi" it would have passed muster. But then it would not be factual.

Thanks,
Gerry Bello
for the Free Press

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NSA spying is legal becau...»Reply #5