Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MattBaggins

(7,948 posts)
22. If you can get this money, why no provide money to the schools that are poor?
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 01:43 PM
Feb 2012

Where are all these kids going to go?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

In a word, no, except if by 'work' ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #1
How is providing an additional funding stream robbing? If the money comes from a new federal BrentWil Feb 2012 #5
If the feds do it, why wouldn't ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #8
Because they are already running schools BrentWil Feb 2012 #11
Yes, I read the OP. But I don't see ANY ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #15
Here are the portions of the OP BrentWil Feb 2012 #16
The only alleged BENEFIT for poor children I see in your posts is ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #18
Where am I suggesting that? BrentWil Feb 2012 #23
See post #17 below. You are ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #30
While not popular on this board, there is plenty of evidence that some Dems do support BrentWil Feb 2012 #31
I DARE you to find a WH.gov link ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #35
That isn't what I said BrentWil Feb 2012 #43
Is that support for a national voucher program ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #49
What I said is that if you read some of their statements BrentWil Feb 2012 #50
So you admit your ultimate goal is to destroy public schools-- ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #51
I would assume the ultimate goal is education... BrentWil Feb 2012 #53
Arne Duncan is the worst thing to have happened to education for a long time. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #75
Maybe... BrentWil Feb 2012 #82
There's plenty of evidence that some "dems" support all kinds of RW policies. So what? Edweird Feb 2012 #96
How is a federal program that gives money to the poor, "RW"? NT BrentWil Feb 2012 #97
Privatization is RW. Edweird Feb 2012 #100
Who is providing privatization? BrentWil Feb 2012 #101
If you can get this money, why no provide money to the schools that are poor? MattBaggins Feb 2012 #22
Because it gives the power to the poor family and actually does give them a some economic power over BrentWil Feb 2012 #24
And the kids whose parents don't bother to apply are out of luck. proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #34
The school would have a self interest in insuring the money is there.. BrentWil Feb 2012 #39
And what happens if every family accepts these vouchers? sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #78
Everyone in the income will and most of the money will go to Public Schools BrentWil Feb 2012 #79
How would this be a "NEW" federal funding stream? ProgressiveEconomist Feb 2012 #17
Not just no, but hell no! white_wolf Feb 2012 #2
WHy? BrentWil Feb 2012 #7
I firmly oppose any attempts at privatization of formerly public services. white_wolf Feb 2012 #10
Why? BrentWil Feb 2012 #12
because privatization doesn't work DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #41
Rich kids like private schools and it seems to work for getting into Harvard, for example BrentWil Feb 2012 #44
Why don't you check out the history of the Public Schools, and maybe you can sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #80
I don't have a problem as long as they are only good at public schools and that's it. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #3
This would not work because there is not enough room in the top schools for all the JDPriestly Feb 2012 #4
But it does give a means to pay and a reason for people to develop "topnotch" schools in poorer BrentWil Feb 2012 #13
I do not see that it would get more funding into schools that have to educate a poorer JDPriestly Feb 2012 #37
If the money is only given to the poor to use, BrentWil Feb 2012 #38
You are thinking in the abstract. JDPriestly Feb 2012 #90
No I am not... BrentWil Feb 2012 #91
You don't need vouchers for public schools. LiberalFighter Feb 2012 #6
Public schools by law have to provide a "free and appropriate education" PA Democrat Feb 2012 #9
How does it drain funds, if the funding comes from a different source? BrentWil Feb 2012 #14
Because special education is not fully funded by the federal and state governments. PA Democrat Feb 2012 #20
The tax base and the current funding streams are still there.. BrentWil Feb 2012 #26
$10K to educate a child with special needs? That is a drop in the bucket PA Democrat Feb 2012 #29
There's a point you're missing: most states fund schools based on the number of students attending Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2012 #36
If you have less students.. BrentWil Feb 2012 #46
If a private school... zoechen Feb 2012 #19
There are certain departments I believe shouldn't be privatized newspeak Feb 2012 #21
Take my word on it nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #28
10k could buy you a whole year at Sidwell. The average tuition award there is over 20k. msanthrope Feb 2012 #32
Why would anyone use such a voucher in a public school KamaAina Feb 2012 #25
Because it offers a better value then other schools in the area.. BrentWil Feb 2012 #48
This ProSense Feb 2012 #55
Because this puts the power into the hands of the poor BrentWil Feb 2012 #56
Nonsense ProSense Feb 2012 #58
A child that brings 10K to a public school would not be irrelevant. BrentWil Feb 2012 #60
Wait ProSense Feb 2012 #64
Do you know what 10K of free money to a poor school or school district means? BrentWil Feb 2012 #66
What? ProSense Feb 2012 #69
Federal money for local districts with no strings is free money, for them NT BrentWil Feb 2012 #76
That's ProSense Feb 2012 #81
Maybe... BrentWil Feb 2012 #83
Local schools and districts are the means to do that... BrentWil Feb 2012 #71
Hell must have frozen, but I could not agree with you more. n/t sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #84
We agree on most things, actually... BrentWil Feb 2012 #88
Because ProSense Feb 2012 #54
Do you really think the GOP would support a program as outlined above? BrentWil Feb 2012 #57
Actually ProSense Feb 2012 #61
Arguing something is RW doesn't make it so... BrentWil Feb 2012 #63
Do ProSense Feb 2012 #65
Why would a federal block grant to public schools that educate poorer kids be bad? BrentWil Feb 2012 #67
I ProSense Feb 2012 #68
How does does this "denigrates the concept of public education and opens the system to abuse" BrentWil Feb 2012 #70
Well, ProSense Feb 2012 #72
I woud argue that giving more funding to poor public schools allows the local school the tools BrentWil Feb 2012 #73
It's ProSense Feb 2012 #74
Still haven't answered why more funding for poorer schools is a bad thing. BrentWil Feb 2012 #77
Vouchers are a means to privatize education nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #27
No. We should help ALL of our low income kids. proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #33
I would want no real application process... BrentWil Feb 2012 #40
133% of poverty is fucking poor, those folks will not have the rest of the money for private school TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #59
Accreditation for Private schools are done by independent private bodies, I thought BrentWil Feb 2012 #62
They have to have money to operate, they operate across state lines, and credibilty is TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #86
To what end? BrentWil Feb 2012 #87
No, no, no, TEN THOUSAND TIMES NO Hugabear Feb 2012 #42
Then this would solve that problem. So there we go. NT BrentWil Feb 2012 #47
+1 proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #52
No! The poor need to be confined to their own Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #45
Either very good sarcastic remarker or really bad post NT BrentWil Feb 2012 #85
School vouchers always have been and always will be a nutty idea Major Nikon Feb 2012 #89
You would outlaw private schools? BrentWil Feb 2012 #92
I'm fine with private schools just so long as I don't have to help fund them Major Nikon Feb 2012 #93
Then you will have a poorly administered national school system that only the middle to poor class BrentWil Feb 2012 #94
Local control of the school system is what has created the mess we have Major Nikon Feb 2012 #95
No Child Left behind is federal control... BrentWil Feb 2012 #98
Exactly Major Nikon Feb 2012 #99
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could Federal Educational...»Reply #22