General Discussion

pnwmom

(108,997 posts)

57. Do you seriously think terrorists can't get hold of nuclear materials?

Reply to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #55)

Sun Jun 30, 2013, 10:35 PM

Jun 2013

They couldn't cause a blast like at Hiroshima, but they could make a city uninhabitable.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NSA-gate: What did Obama do? [View all] ucrdem Jun 2013 OP

and now 22 democratic senators are asking very specific questions in writing think Jun 2013 #1

Yes, naturally there's a connection. ucrdem Jun 2013 #2

They also read the NSA website while looking for truth... think Jun 2013 #3

I imagine they'll get a response, too, if they haven't already. ucrdem Jun 2013 #4

No. I'm sure you don't think Jun 2013 #15

OMG everyone's out to get Obama's administration. round up the usual supects nt msongs Jun 2013 #5

I can't speak for the signatories ucrdem Jun 2013 #7

let me point out that Sentor Leahy has been concerned about the cali Jun 2013 #27

Of course there's a connection. This is another fake scandal that they have to try to address. n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #39

If all it took was tenacity you'd be a champ. think Jun 2013 #40

This is the first I've heard that FISA went back to Carter. snot Jun 2013 #6

It's the FISA law of 1978. OnyxCollie Jun 2013 #8

Yes, the FISA bill was submitted in May '77 and signed into law by Carter in Oct. '78, ucrdem Jun 2013 #10

You believe Obama? Who signed the NDAA section 1021 allowing for the indefinite detention of US Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #9

Yes, but the NDAA is a separate issue, no? ucrdem Jun 2013 #11

Goes to motive. He signed it twice, and sent lawyers to defend section 1021 in court Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #13

Have you convinced yourself that Obama has committed a crime? ucrdem Jun 2013 #17

Firstly, I'm an Occupier, not a tea fuck, so kindly apologize. Leading with insults? Poor. Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #18

"Goes to motive" suggests that you're discussing a criminal action by the US president. ucrdem Jun 2013 #20

Oh wait, you HAVE convinced yourself Obama has committed a crime, ucrdem Jun 2013 #21

Again Aerows Jun 2013 #30

You haven't been here Aerows Jun 2013 #29

Cute, now you call long term DU'ers nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #45

That's nonsense. They're two separate issues. n/ pnwmom Jun 2013 #42

Your house is on fire. It is burning to the ground. Wake up and do something to save it. Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #43

I grew up in a generation where they had us get under desks to protect against a nuclear attack. pnwmom Jun 2013 #44

The greatest danger is for everyone to give all power to Bush and the corporations Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #46

So instead of a commie you got a terrorist under the bed nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #53

The threat of nuclear war was all too real pnwmom Jun 2013 #54

The threat of nuclear war was very real...ironically...actually really nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #55

Do you seriously think terrorists can't get hold of nuclear materials? pnwmom Jun 2013 #57

You are still comparing an extinction level event nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #58

kick! jazzimov Jun 2013 #12

So no warrantless wiretapping is happening now? No collection, just in case snot Jun 2013 #14

No evidence of any has been brought forward, no. ucrdem Jun 2013 #16

You aren't serious, are you? Six corporations, including Mitt Romney's Bain Capital, own Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #19

What the heck is that supposed to mean? ucrdem Jun 2013 #22

You cannot enter "pruit igoe spraying" into an internet search engine to learn why it is foolish Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #24

Article from Friday in Business Insider Waiting For Everyman Jun 2013 #23

"it is hard to distinguish email metadata from email content" -- No its not. DCBob Jun 2013 #25

They are talking about the dispute over whether subject lines are content or metadata. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2013 #32

Its still easy technically to separate that out. DCBob Jun 2013 #33

Disputed among the authorities themselves does not equal "easy" to tell. n/t Waiting For Everyman Jun 2013 #34

See snot Jun 2013 #36

Props to leveymg for resuscitating that nasty powerpoint ucrdem Jun 2013 #37

Of course the bashers will find some other way to continue bashing. DCBob Jun 2013 #26

there's this: cali Jun 2013 #28

Thanks. How can I put this in a way you will understand. Let's try this: ucrdem Jun 2013 #31

"Chomsky, Scahill, and Hedges, are right-wing." cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #52

Thanks. Scurrilous Jun 2013 #35

Thanks for the link! n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #38

Cool blog bro LittleBlue Jun 2013 #41

Don't expect them to read Steverleser's post. treestar Jun 2013 #47

Thanks treestar... some won't I suppose, and some would if it was shorter, ucrdem Jun 2013 #48

Good going! treestar Jun 2013 #49

1501 for another milestone! ucrdem Jun 2013 #50

Those warrants aren't legal in anything other than the "newspeak" sense of the word legal. MNBrewer Jun 2013 #51

It's not about Obama. nt Zorra Jun 2013 #56