Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Justice Kagan and Justice Scalia Are Hunting Buddies—Really [View all]
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/06/justice-kagan-and-justice-scalia-are-hunting-buddies-really/277401/
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan bagged herself a deer on a hunting trip to Wyoming with Justice Antonin Scalia last fall. You heard that right: Despite finding themselves on opposite sides of major court decisions, the liberal Obama-appointee and the conservative Reagan-appointee have become hunting buddies since Kagan was confirmed in 2010 as the fourth woman in history to sit on the highest court in the land.
"I shoot birds with him, fairly -- you know, two or three times a year now," Justice Kagan said during a wide-ranging and delightful Aspen Ideas Festival conversation with Jeffrey Rosen, president of the National Constitution Center, on Saturday. "And then he um, at the end of last year we had been bird shooting four or five times. I'll tell you how that came to be. But before I do, before I -- he said to me, 'It's time for big game hunting.' And we actually went out to Wyoming this past fall to shoot deer and antelope. Uh, and we did."
"You're getting some hisses from the audience. I hope you were a better shot than Dick Cheney," Rosen interjected as a smattering of hisses emerged from around the room at the mention of hunting in Wyoming.
"I shot myself a deer," Kagan continued. "The way this started, I'll tell the story. You know the NRA has become quite a presence in judicial confirmations, and that means when you go around from office to office, from chamber to chamber, I met with about 80 senators individually and quite a lot of them, both Republicans and Democrats, ask you about your views on the Second Amendment. But because you don't say anything about your views on anything, when they ask you well, they'll try to figure out what your views on the Second Amendment are likely to be and they'll say, 'Well, have you ever held a gun? Have you ever gone hunting? Do you know anybody who's gone hunting?' And you know me, Jeff, I grew up on the Upper West Side of Manhattan and this was not something we really did, you know.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kagan should be careful, just in case Big Tone has any of those "Cheney" tendencies. nt
MADem
Jul 2013
#1
Oops, I slipped on a wet rock! Darn the bad luck...hope they can get all that stuff outta yer face,
MADem
Jul 2013
#64
You can't get an emotional charge from something unless there is a gun involved?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2013
#27
I meant to type enjoying KILLING living breathing sentient creatures is disgusting--
MotherPetrie
Jul 2013
#28
They are doing it because they enjoy killing animals. They aren't hunting to live.
MotherPetrie
Jul 2013
#24
Deer are tasty. Surely there is a middle ground between OMG SLAUGHTER and the noble image of a poor
Brickbat
Jul 2013
#30
I think it shows a clear unbias in Judge Kagan, to want to learn about something could ruled on
graham4anything
Jul 2013
#31
I apologize for helping devolve this thread into an argument about hunting, when, to me, the issue
Brickbat
Jul 2013
#32
Exactly -- political factions, at this level, are much more like professional sports teams. They're
Brickbat
Jul 2013
#37
Hmmm. "coming together to unnecessarily kill a third". Just for fun, too. Creepy.
GoneFishin
Jul 2013
#59