Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ganja Ninja

(15,953 posts)
6. I just can't believe that we have a presidential candidate running against the sexual revolution.
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 02:39 PM
Feb 2012

The sexual revolution is 50 years old for crying out loud! Jeez, live in the past much? I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. We've been rehashing the New Deal for the last decade or two and that's almost 80 years old. Talk about not being able to deal with change.

And what is this guy's obsession with other people's sex lives? Aren't Republican's the ones always complaining about the nanny state? He says he's not running for preacher but he sure is preachy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

too much information Enrique Feb 2012 #1
Airdales? aint_no_life_nowhere Feb 2012 #9
The more Santorum talks? The less likely he is to be President. FSogol Feb 2012 #2
Yeah seriously. He's the last guy I want running this country. Initech Feb 2012 #7
Someone needs to photoshop a huge black beard and cleric garb on him. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #10
he needs a very libertine hooker, sex of his choice. What a slab he is. roguevalley Feb 2012 #24
"...how things are supposed to be." Solly Mack Feb 2012 #3
Santorum seems to be a Dominionist. He wants the U.S. to be run based on his particular religion. yardwork Feb 2012 #4
Translation: Tsiyu Feb 2012 #5
lol Doremus Feb 2012 #26
I just can't believe that we have a presidential candidate running against the sexual revolution. Ganja Ninja Feb 2012 #6
Santorum needs to get some ASAP tabbycat31 Feb 2012 #8
We shall now address him as Mullah Santorum Scootaloo Feb 2012 #11
these are the same people who label liberals as anti-personal freedom Johonny Feb 2012 #12
Nor can he lay claim to the label of "sane citizen of hifiguy Feb 2012 #13
Since Santorum believes that each sex act must at least admit the possibility LibertyLover Feb 2012 #14
Exactly!! vankuria Feb 2012 #16
You and I both LibertyLover Feb 2012 #23
I was also born in 1960 Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #27
We can't waste sperm by masturbating or using contraception aint_no_life_nowhere Feb 2012 #28
Some questions for Rick Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #15
that barely scratches the surface of Rick's twisted brain waddirum Feb 2012 #35
the more he talks about this warrior1 Feb 2012 #17
oh little ricky, you are talking creepy stalker talk. Javaman Feb 2012 #18
So what are priests doing about their own sexuality? Wanking of course. Then moralizing about it. Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #19
where are the pharmaceutical companies? IcyPeas Feb 2012 #20
well.... guitar man Feb 2012 #21
He needs to mind his own fucking business! Quantess Feb 2012 #22
"I'm not running for preacher" Redstate Bluegirl Feb 2012 #25
Dork! fascisthunter Feb 2012 #29
So when did Dick Santorum become a doctor? LynneSin Feb 2012 #30
Clearly Santorum is running to be "Whack-Job-in Chief" JoePhilly Feb 2012 #31
Man on Dog needs to stop obsessing about sex tavalon Feb 2012 #32
Thank God he'll never be President! nt Lunacee2012 Feb 2012 #33
It's this moral superiority BS that the R's use to justify their immoral behavior... Scuba Feb 2012 #34
It all comes down..... sendero Feb 2012 #36
Sanctimonious Santorum PotatoChip Feb 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Santorum: what is "s...»Reply #6