Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Deep13

(39,157 posts)

8. Where to draw the line for incest will always be judgement call.

Reply to justiceischeap (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 1, 2013, 12:26 PM

Jul 2013

Certainly siblings and linear descendants/ancestors are out. 3rd cousins 2 generations removed? Meh.

Agree that the strategy is to dehumanize the "other" by comparing them to animals and perverts. Glad it failed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I feel a need to spell-out the rebuttals to the gay-marriage slippery slope arguments. [View all] Deep13 Jul 2013 OP

Not to mention the obvious Notafraidtoo Jul 2013 #1

True about the contracts. Deep13 Jul 2013 #2

If you want an argument against incest Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2013 #6

The test case for plural marriage customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #3

the idea of plural marriages involving both many men and many women intrigues me lunatica Jul 2013 #4

Perhaps. My concern would be that jealousies would tear it apart. Deep13 Jul 2013 #7

The 'rules' would be different lunatica Jul 2013 #17

The real issue of the slippery slope argument is that it's yet another way justiceischeap Jul 2013 #5

Where to draw the line for incest will always be judgement call. Deep13 Jul 2013 #8

You forgot one objection... Jeff In Milwaukee Jul 2013 #9

I've been flirting with a cute pencil sharpener. Deep13 Jul 2013 #11

Ow. Just...you know. Ow. Jeff In Milwaukee Jul 2013 #15

What of the argument that Churches will be eventually required to marry people they don't want to?nt el_bryanto Jul 2013 #10

They are not required to do it now. Deep13 Jul 2013 #12

You can choose not to - but if you want to be married in a Catholic or Baptist or Muslim ceremony el_bryanto Jul 2013 #13

Sorry, but the 1st Am. protects institutional bigotry if it is religious. Deep13 Jul 2013 #14

Here's the answer to that customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #16